Is ContextStream safe to use?

ContextStream has an HVTrust score of 79.9/100 (Grade B), ranked #98 of 1320 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for ContextStream?

ContextStream scores 79.9/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 41 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

ContextStream

contextstream/mcp-server

Intelligence without context is unreliable. Autonomy without context is chaos. And context without trust becomes surveil

MCP Servers Rust Grade B Listed MIT

79.9/100

Rank #98 of 1320

Compare ContextStream

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-04 · 0d ago

Recent change

Provenance +11

Is ContextStream safe? ContextStream scores 79.9/100 (Grade B), ranked #98 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.3/10; 17% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#37 Copilot Money — 80.2 (A) → #38 Google Analytics MCP — 80.1 (A) → #40 Sec Edgar MCP — 79.7 (B) → #41 Mikrotik MCP — 79.6 (B) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Recent Changes

2026-09-02

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-02

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank rose 866 spots (#962 → #96)

Maintainer Checklist

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for ContextStream View MCP Servers Report missing data

54.8

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#39

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-04

today

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

852

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #97

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

79.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

ContextStream MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

17.5 / 25

8.0 above avg 9.5

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

14.7 / 17

2.9 above avg 11.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

16.9 / 20

4.7 above avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.8 / 20

1.6 above avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

54.8 / 100

StarsRepository reach

9.7 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

15.3 / 25

CommunityFork signal

4.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

npm attestation

OSSF Scorecard

7.3 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 4, 2026

Signed Commits

17%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 6

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 4

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 6

SAST 10

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 9

Vulnerabilities 9

Is ContextStream safe?

Public supply-chain signals for ContextStream are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but ContextStream carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.

Does ContextStream publish package provenance?

Yes. ContextStream's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does ContextStream have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

ContextStream has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is ContextStream actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does ContextStream use?

ContextStream ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are ContextStream's commits signed?

17% of the last 100 commits to ContextStream are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

ContextStream appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

low confidence

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to ContextStream's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-02

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain ContextStream?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores ContextStream from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-02

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-02

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank rose 866 spots (#962 → #96)

2026-09-02

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 40.6pts (38.5 → 79.1)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#950 → #962)

2026-09-01

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 5pts (48 → 53)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#919 → #950)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 43 spots (#876 → #919)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#829 → #876)

2026-08-28

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.7/10

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank rose 302 spots (#1131 → #829)

2026-08-28

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 16.8pts (20.5 → 37.3)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#1114 → #1131)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 68 spots (#1046 → #1114)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#1038 → #1052)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#1027 → #1037)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#1017 → #1027)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 56 spots (#956 → #1012)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #946

GitHub → npm: @contextstream/mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/contextstream.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/contextstream)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/contextstream"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/contextstream.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON