nWave

AI agents that guide you from idea to working code, with you in control at every step.

Agent Skills Python Grade D Listed MIT
36.9/100
Rank #20 of 148
Compare nWave

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-06-27 · 46d ago
Recent change
New

Is nWave safe? nWave scores 36.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #20 of 148 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 11% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-06-27. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Skills

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #20
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 46 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
43.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#20

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 46 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
593
Forks
61
Last Push
2026-06-27
46 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
26
Rank Change
=
was #20

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Skills

36.9 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

nWave Agent Skills average (148 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
8.1 / 25
5.4 above avg 2.7
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
6.7 above avg 11.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
8.9 / 20
6.2 below avg 15.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.7 / 20
2.5 below avg 9.2

Activity Inputs

43.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
16.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
18.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
Not available
Signed Commits
11%
of last 100 commits verified

Is nWave safe?

Public trust evidence for nWave is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does nWave publish package provenance?
Yes. nWave's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does nWave have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for nWave. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is nWave actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 46 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does nWave use?
nWave ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are nWave's commits signed?
11% of the last 100 commits to nWave are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain nWave?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores nWave from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1
2026-08-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #20

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 36.9 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/nwave.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/nwave)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/nwave"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/nwave.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON