updated 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC

Notebooklm MCP Secure

Pantheon-Security/notebooklm-mcp-secure

Secure NotebookLM MCP Server - Query Google NotebookLM from Claude/AI agents with 17 security hardening layers

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Notebooklm MCP Secure safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 1%
Last push 23d ago
Compare Notebooklm MCP Secure

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Notebooklm MCP Secure scores 52.0/100 (Grade C), ranked #882 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.8/10; 1% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-03. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Notebooklm MCP Secure compares in MCP Servers

  1. #497 MacOS MCP 52.1 +0.1
  2. #498 Weather MCP Server 52.1 +0.1
  3. #499 Notebooklm MCP Secure 52.0 this agent
  4. #500 Codealive MCP 51.9 −0.1
  5. #501 Mobai MCP 51.9 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Notebooklm MCP Secure’s 52.0.

Where the 52.0 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

52.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Notebooklm MCP Secure MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.8 / 25
5.5 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.7 / 17
0.5 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
12.4 / 20
in line with avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.3 / 20
in line with avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#874 → #884)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Notebooklm MCP Secure View MCP Servers Report missing data
45.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#499
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 23 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
84
Forks
18
Last Push
2026-09-03
23 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
2
Downloads (7d)
101
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▲2
was #884

Analysis

Activity Inputs

45.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
11.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
21.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
6.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.8 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 23, 2026
Signed Commits
1%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 10
License 10
Maintained 1
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 2
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Notebooklm MCP Secure

Public trust evidence for Notebooklm MCP Secure is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Notebooklm MCP Secure publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Notebooklm MCP Secure. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Notebooklm MCP Secure have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Notebooklm MCP Secure has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Notebooklm MCP Secure actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 23 days ago.
What license does Notebooklm MCP Secure use?
Notebooklm MCP Secure ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Notebooklm MCP Secure's commits signed?
1% of the last 100 commits to Notebooklm MCP Secure are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Notebooklm MCP Secure appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Notebooklm MCP Secure's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Notebooklm MCP Secure?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Notebooklm MCP Secure from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 21HVTrust 3Listed 2Grade 2Score 1Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#874 → #884)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 171 spots (#1038 → #867)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.2pts (24.0 → 52.2)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1038
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#850 → #861)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#836 → #826)
2026-09-09
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.8/10
2026-09-09
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank rose 427 spots (#1262 → #835)
2026-09-09
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 21.1pts (31.5 → 52.6)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1251 → #1262)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#1236 → #1251)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1218 → #1236)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#1196 → #1218)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#1179 → #1196)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 99 spots (#1278 → #1179)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.3pts (19.7 → 32.0)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#1257 → #1278)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1239 → #1257)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#1219 → #1239)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1201 → #1219)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1184 → #1202)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#1170 → #1184)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 51 spots (#1119 → #1170)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 88 spots (#1202 → #1114)
2026-08-24
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 12pts (31 → 42)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1179 → #1205)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 71 spots (#1105 → #1176)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1101
GitHub → npm: @pan-sec/notebooklm-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 52.0 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/notebooklm-mcp-secure.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/notebooklm-mcp-secure)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/notebooklm-mcp-secure"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/notebooklm-mcp-secure.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON