updated 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC

Mobile Device MCP

srmorete/mobile-device-mcp

An MCP server to use with iOS and Android. Seamlessly maps Native screens and WebViews. Multiple parallel devices supported.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Mobile Device MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 45%
Last push 55d ago
Compare Mobile Device MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Mobile Device MCP scores 48.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #970 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.1/10; 45% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Mobile Device MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #560 Grok MCP 48.9 ±0
  2. #561 Figma MCP Rust 48.9 ±0
  3. #562 Mobile Device MCP 48.9 this agent
  4. #563 Codex MCP Tool 48.9 ±0
  5. #564 Dbmcp 48.8 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Mobile Device MCP’s 48.9.

Where the 48.9 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

48.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Mobile Device MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.1 / 25
4.2 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.1 / 17
1.1 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
8.3 / 20
3.8 below avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.6 / 20
0.6 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#957 → #969)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 219 spots (#1180 → #961)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 55 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Mobile Device MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data
29.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#562
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 55 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
47
Forks
1
Last Push
2026-08-02
55 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
84
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
3
Rank Change
▼1
was #969

Analysis

Activity Inputs

29.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
10.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
17.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
1.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 20, 2026
Signed Commits
45%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 9
Branch-Protection 6
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies -1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Mobile Device MCP

Public trust evidence for Mobile Device MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Mobile Device MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Mobile Device MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Mobile Device MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Mobile Device MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Mobile Device MCP actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 55 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Mobile Device MCP use?
Mobile Device MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Mobile Device MCP's commits signed?
45% of the last 100 commits to Mobile Device MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Mobile Device MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Mobile Device MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Mobile Device MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Mobile Device MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 23HVTrust 3Listed 2Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#957 → #969)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 219 spots (#1180 → #961)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 29.1pts (19.9 → 49.0)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1180
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#940 → #950)
2026-09-10
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#895 → #912)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 48 spots (#838 → #886)
2026-09-06
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 365 spots (#1203 → #838)
2026-09-06
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 16.7pts (33.8 → 50.5)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#1171 → #1203)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#1155 → #1171)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#1114 → #1155)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#1068 → #1114)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#1027 → #1068)
2026-08-31
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.1/10
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank rose 177 spots (#1204 → #1027)
2026-08-31
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 13.8pts (20.3 → 34.1)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1173 → #1204)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#1146 → #1173)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#1122 → #1146)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#1103 → #1122)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 68 spots (#1035 → #1103)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#1018 → #1035)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#1029 → #1018)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#995 → #1029)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#988 → #998)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#1000 → #988)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 55 spots (#942 → #997)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #929
GitHub → npm: @srmorete/mobile-device-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 48.9 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mobile-device-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mobile-device-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mobile-device-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mobile-device-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON