Is MCP Brasil safe to use?

MCP Brasil has an HVTrust score of 47.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #1015 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for MCP Brasil?

MCP Brasil scores 47.2/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 1.8k GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

MCP Brasil

Mcp-Brasil/mcp-brasil

MCP Server para 70 APIs públicas brasileiras

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is MCP Brasil safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 9%

Last push 7d ago

Compare MCP Brasil

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: MCP Brasil scores 47.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #1015 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.4/10; 9% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How MCP Brasil compares in MCP Servers

#593 Simplenote MCP 47.3 +0.1
#594 Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global 47.3 +0.1
#595 MCP Brasil 47.2 this agent
#596 UnrealMCP — AI Bridge for Unreal Engine 5 47.1 −0.1
#597 Meta MCP 47.1 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Brasil’s 47.2.

Where the 47.2 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

47.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Brasil MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

4.7 / 25

5.6 below avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.4 / 17

0.8 below avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

11.5 / 20

0.6 below avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.8 / 20

0.6 above avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#1002 → #1013)

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Brasil View MCP Servers Report missing data

55.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#595

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

1.8k

Forks

274

Last Push

2026-09-19

7 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼2

was #1013

Analysis

Activity Inputs

55.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

19.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

11.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.4 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 25, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 1

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 8

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about MCP Brasil

Public trust evidence for MCP Brasil is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does MCP Brasil publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Brasil. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does MCP Brasil have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

MCP Brasil has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is MCP Brasil actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 7 day(s).

What license does MCP Brasil use?

MCP Brasil ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are MCP Brasil's commits signed?

9% of the last 100 commits to MCP Brasil are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

MCP Brasil appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Brasil's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-03

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: OpenAI

2026-08-19

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

Maintain MCP Brasil?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Brasil from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#1002 → #1013)

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 461 spots (#543 → #1004)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 9.9pts (37.5 → 47.4)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #543

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-19

Rank Moved

Rank rose 43 spots (#1033 → #990)

2026-09-18

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 103 spots (#930 → #1033)

2026-09-18

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 3.9pts (49.6 → 45.7)

2026-09-18

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 12pts (64 → 52)

2026-09-12

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#891 → #910)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#844 → #884)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#828 → #844)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 61 spots (#767 → #828)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#738 → #767)

2026-09-03

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: OpenAI

2026-09-03

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#726 → #738)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 34 spots (#692 → #726)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#663 → #692)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#623 → #663)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#612 → #623)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#572 → #612)

2026-08-28

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.4/10

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank rose 529 spots (#1101 → #572)

2026-08-28

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 28.3pts (21.4 → 49.7)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#1087 → #1101)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 76 spots (#1011 → #1087)

2026-08-19

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank rose 233 spots (#1240 → #1007)

2026-08-19

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 5.7pts (16.0 → 21.7)

2026-08-19

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 28pts (40 → 68)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#1216 → #1245)

2026-08-10

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1213

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-brasil.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-brasil)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-brasil"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-brasil.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON