Memory Bank MCP
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation for remote memory bank management, inspired by Cline Memory Bank.
Is Memory Bank MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare Memory Bank MCP
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Memory Bank MCP scores 31.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #1280 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.0/10; 30% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2025-08-20. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Memory Bank MCP compares in MCP Servers
- #761 Academia MCP 32.6 +1.5
- #762 A Mem MCP 32.0 +0.9
- #763 Memory Bank MCP 31.1 this agent
- #764 MCP Server Taiwan Weather 30.9 −0.2
- #765 PapersFlow 30.6 −0.5
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Memory Bank MCP’s 31.1.
Where the 31.1 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
31.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMemory Bank MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
26.8 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Memory Bank MCP
Does Memory Bank MCP publish package provenance?
Does Memory Bank MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Memory Bank MCP actively maintained?
What license does Memory Bank MCP use?
Are Memory Bank MCP's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- filesystem
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Memory Bank MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Memory Bank MCP?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Memory Bank MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/memory-bank-mcp)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/memory-bank-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/memory-bank-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON