MCP Server Taiwan Weather

用於取得臺灣中央氣象署 API 資料的 Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server。

MCP Servers TypeScript Needs review MIT

Is MCP Server Taiwan Weather safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 100%
Last push 415d ago
Advisories None known
Compare MCP Server Taiwan Weather
Suggest a correction

In detail: MCP Server Taiwan Weather scores 30.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #1322 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.2/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (@gonetone/mcp-server-taiwan-weather); last pushed 2025-09-21. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How MCP Server Taiwan Weather could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Active listing, but review is needed
  • [4.2.1] no meaningful activity in 12 months (last push 2025-09-21)

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships MCP Server Taiwan Weather and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/GoneTone/mcp-server-taiwan-weather, MIT, last pushed 2025-09-21. 100% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.2/10 (scanned Nov 9, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions9
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests -1
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 0
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 9
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages Linked, not attested

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: @gonetone/mcp-server-taiwan-weather 0.1.4. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-10).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-02 OSSF Scorecard: 3.2/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues MCP Server Taiwan Weather’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How MCP Server Taiwan Weather compares in MCP Servers

  1. #760 Memory Bank MCP 31.6 +0.7
  2. #761 Operant MCP 31.2 +0.3
  3. #762 MCP Server Taiwan Weather 30.9 this agent
  4. #763 Logoloom 30.8 −0.1
  5. #764 PapersFlow 30.6 −0.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Server Taiwan Weather’s 30.9.

Where the 30.9 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

30.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Server Taiwan Weather MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
9.0 / 25
1.8 below avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.9 below avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.2 / 17
1.1 below avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
0 / 20
12.2 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
4.9 / 20
2.7 below avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 415 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Review Flags
[4.2.1] no meaningful activity in 12 months (last push 2025-09-21)
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
7.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#762

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 415 days ago — may be stale

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
11
Forks
1
Last Push
2025-09-21
415 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
51
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
=
was #1322

Analysis

Activity Inputs

7.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
6.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
1.4 / 20

Common questions about MCP Server Taiwan Weather

Public trust evidence for MCP Server Taiwan Weather is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does MCP Server Taiwan Weather publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Server Taiwan Weather. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does MCP Server Taiwan Weather have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MCP Server Taiwan Weather has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MCP Server Taiwan Weather actively maintained?
Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 415 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.
What license does MCP Server Taiwan Weather use?
MCP Server Taiwan Weather ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Server Taiwan Weather's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to MCP Server Taiwan Weather are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Server Taiwan Weather appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Server Taiwan Weather's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain MCP Server Taiwan Weather?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Server Taiwan Weather from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 12HVTrust 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1Warning Issued 1MCP 1
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1295 → #1306)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 46 spots (#1326 → #1280)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 27.4pts (3.4 → 30.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1326
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#1137 → #1150)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#1127 → #1140)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1089 → #1120)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#1073 → #1089)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#1030 → #1073)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#1007 → #1030)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 57 spots (#950 → #1007)
2026-09-02
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.2/10
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 350 spots (#1300 → #950)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 25.3pts (15.8 → 41.1)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#1248 → #1269)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1224 → #1250)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 30.9 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-server-taiwan-weather.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-server-taiwan-weather)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-server-taiwan-weather"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-server-taiwan-weather.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON