MCP Server for OSCAL

OSCAL tools for AI agents

MCP Servers Python Needs review Apache-2.0

Is MCP Server for OSCAL safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 95%
Last push 95d ago
Compare MCP Server for OSCAL
Suggest a correction

In detail: MCP Server for OSCAL scores 62.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #558 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.5/10; 95% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-06-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Active listing, but review is needed
  • [5.1] repository is archived

How MCP Server for OSCAL compares in MCP Servers

  1. #312 Red Hat Lightspeed MCP 62.5 +0.2
  2. #313 Arr MCP 62.4 +0.1
  3. #314 MCP Server for OSCAL 62.3 this agent
  4. #315 Unity MCP 62.3 ±0
  5. #316 Power BI Modeling MCP Server 62.3 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Server for OSCAL’s 62.3.

Where the 62.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

62.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Server for OSCAL MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
17.9 / 25
7.6 above avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.3 / 17
in line with avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
5.7 / 20
6.4 below avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.4 / 20
0.8 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve maintenance to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-26
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Amazon Bedrock
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 95 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Review Flags
[5.1] repository is archived
26.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#314

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 95 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
53
Forks
8
Last Push
2026-06-23
95 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
45
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
9
Rank Change
▲2
was #560

Analysis

Activity Inputs

26.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
10.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
11.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
4.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 24, 2026
Signed Commits
95%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 9
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about MCP Server for OSCAL

MCP Server for OSCAL has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does MCP Server for OSCAL publish package provenance?
Yes. MCP Server for OSCAL's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does MCP Server for OSCAL have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MCP Server for OSCAL has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MCP Server for OSCAL actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 95 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does MCP Server for OSCAL use?
MCP Server for OSCAL ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Server for OSCAL's commits signed?
94% of the last 100 commits to MCP Server for OSCAL are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Server for OSCAL appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Server for OSCAL's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Amazon Bedrock
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

Maintain MCP Server for OSCAL?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Server for OSCAL from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 19Listed 2HVTrust 2Warning Issued 2Surface 1Scorecard 1Delisted 1Grade 1Provenance 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-09-26
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Amazon Bedrock
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 620 spots (#1172 → #552)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 42.2pts (20.2 → 62.4)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1172
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#490 → #502)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#459 → #490)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#448 → #459)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 65 spots (#383 → #448)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#372 → #383)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#352 → #372)
2026-09-02
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#306 → #336)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#316 → #306)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#297 → #316)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#277 → #288)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.5/10
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 144 spots (#421 → #277)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 9.2pts (54.8 → 64.0)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#402 → #418)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#415 → #400)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#399 → #411)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#411 → #399)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#382 → #399)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#400 → #382)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#378 → #398)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #375

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 62.3 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-server-for-oscal.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-server-for-oscal)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-server-for-oscal"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-server-for-oscal.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON