CN Scraper MCP

Let AI agents search the Chinese internet via MCP — Taobao, JD, Xiaohongshu, Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, ZSXQ, Douban, Dianping, and more.

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is CN Scraper MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 0%
Last push 59d ago
Compare CN Scraper MCP
Suggest a correction

In detail: CN Scraper MCP scores 62.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #563 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.5/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-07-29. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How CN Scraper MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #317 Power BI Modeling MCP Server 62.3 ±0
  2. #318 Companies House MCP 62.3 ±0
  3. #319 CN Scraper MCP 62.3 this agent
  4. #320 Wet MCP 62.2 −0.1
  5. #321 MCP Server for OSCAL 62.2 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks CN Scraper MCP’s 62.3.

Where the 62.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

62.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

CN Scraper MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.9 / 25
1.6 above avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.5 / 17
0.7 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
8.1 / 20
3.9 below avg 12.0
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.8 / 20
in line with avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 59 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
29.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#319

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 12:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 59 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
47
Forks
3
Last Push
2026-07-29
59 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
110
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
=
was #563

Analysis

Activity Inputs

29.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
10.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
16.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
2.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
3.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 16, 2026
Signed Commits
0%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about CN Scraper MCP

CN Scraper MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does CN Scraper MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. CN Scraper MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does CN Scraper MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
CN Scraper MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is CN Scraper MCP actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 59 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does CN Scraper MCP use?
CN Scraper MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are CN Scraper MCP's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to CN Scraper MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
CN Scraper MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to CN Scraper MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain CN Scraper MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores CN Scraper MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 21Listed 2HVTrust 2Score 1Scorecard 1Delisted 1Grade 1Provenance 1MCP 1
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 614 spots (#1165 → #551)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 42.2pts (20.3 → 62.5)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1165
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#456 → #487)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#431 → #456)
2026-09-05
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 141 spots (#572 → #431)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 7.4pts (56.3 → 63.7)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#550 → #572)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#517 → #550)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#500 → #517)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#487 → #500)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#456 → #487)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#447 → #463)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 62 spots (#385 → #447)
2026-08-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 9pts (41 → 32)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#339 → #376)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#323 → #337)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#337 → #319)
2026-08-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#321 → #337)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#304 → #321)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#323 → #308)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#292 → #323)
2026-08-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#279 → #292)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#249 → #279)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#229 → #246)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #224

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 62.3 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/cn-scraper-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/cn-scraper-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/cn-scraper-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/cn-scraper-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON