MCP Console Automation
MCP server for AI-driven console application automation and monitoring
Is MCP Console Automation safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare MCP Console Automation
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: MCP Console Automation scores 57.4/100 (Grade C), ranked #787 of 1387 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.5/10; 95% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (mcp-console-automation); last pushed 2026-11-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MCP Console Automation could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Publish build provenance for its packagesnpm publish --provenance from CI +14.7 → 72.1 B · #195 of 779
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 4.5 to 9.0lowest checks: CII-Best-Practices 0, Dangerous-Workflow 0, Fuzzing 0 +9.4 → 66.8 B · #272 of 779
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships MCP Console Automation and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.
-
Source Signed
github.com/ooples/mcp-console-automation, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-04. 95% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.
-
Review and release Mixed
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.5/10 (scanned Nov 10, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review3
- Branch Protection5
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow0
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies4
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 5CI-Tests 8CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 3Contributors 3Dangerous-Workflow 0Dependency-Update-Tool 10Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 9Packaging 10Pinned-Dependencies 4SAST 7Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions 0Vulnerabilities 0 -
Published packages Linked, not attested
- npm mcp-console-automation Source link points back to this repo No build attestation
Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.
-
What you install today No known advisories
Latest release checked: mcp-console-automation 1.0.2. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-10).
Changes to this chain
- 2026-09-03 OSSF Scorecard: 4.6/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues MCP Console Automation’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.
How MCP Console Automation compares in MCP Servers
- #425 MCP Shodan 57.4 ±0
- #426 ArcGIS MCP Bridge 57.4 ±0
- #427 MCP Console Automation 57.4 this agent
- #428 MeiGen AI Design MCP 57.4 ±0
- #429 MCP Me 57.4 ±0
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Console Automation’s 57.4.
Where the 57.4 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
57.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMCP Console Automation MCP Servers average (779 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
40.3 / 100Common questions about MCP Console Automation
Does MCP Console Automation publish package provenance?
Does MCP Console Automation have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MCP Console Automation actively maintained?
What license does MCP Console Automation use?
Are MCP Console Automation's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to MCP Console Automation's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain MCP Console Automation?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MCP Console Automation from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-console-automation)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-console-automation"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-console-automation.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON