Is MCP Console Automation safe to use?

MCP Console Automation has an HVTrust score of 39.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #1045 of 1320 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for MCP Console Automation?

MCP Console Automation scores 39.9/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 47 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

MCP Console Automation

ooples/mcp-console-automation

MCP server for AI-driven console application automation and monitoring

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT

39.9/100

Rank #1045 of 1320

Compare MCP Console Automation

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-03 · 1d ago

Recent change

Rank +9

Is MCP Console Automation safe? MCP Console Automation scores 39.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #1045 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.6/10; 84% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-03. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#585 OneTool MCP — 39.9 (D) → #586 Agent Security Scanner MCP — 39.9 (D) → #588 Carbon Arc — 39.7 (D) → #589 Texas Grocery MCP — 39.6 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#1005 → #1045)

2026-09-03

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.6/10

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 241 spots (#1246 → #1005)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Console Automation View MCP Servers Report missing data

51.9

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#587

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-03

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼40

was #1005

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

39.9 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

MCP Console Automation MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

10.0 / 25

0.5 above avg 9.5

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.4 / 17

0.6 above avg 11.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

13.7 / 20

1.5 above avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

4.0 / 20

2.2 below avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

51.9 / 100

StarsRepository reach

10.1 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

11.3 / 25

CommunityFork signal

5.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.6 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 3, 2026

Signed Commits

84%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 6

CI-Tests 8

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 1

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 0

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 4

SAST 7

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 2

Is MCP Console Automation safe?

Public trust evidence for MCP Console Automation is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does MCP Console Automation publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Console Automation. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does MCP Console Automation have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

MCP Console Automation has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is MCP Console Automation actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does MCP Console Automation use?

MCP Console Automation ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are MCP Console Automation's commits signed?

84% of the last 100 commits to MCP Console Automation are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

MCP Console Automation appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain MCP Console Automation?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Console Automation from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#1005 → #1045)

2026-09-03

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.6/10

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 241 spots (#1246 → #1005)

2026-09-03

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 18.7pts (22.5 → 41.2)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 34 spots (#1212 → #1246)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#1180 → #1212)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 27 spots (#1153 → #1180)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 39 spots (#1114 → #1153)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#1074 → #1114)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#1046 → #1074)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#1025 → #1046)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 93 spots (#932 → #1025)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#921 → #931)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#934 → #924)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#905 → #934)

2026-08-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#897 → #907)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 53 spots (#864 → #917)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #861

GitHub → npm: mcp-console-automation

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-console-automation.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-console-automation)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-console-automation"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-console-automation.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON