MCP Client for Ollama
Harness the power of local LLMs with this TUI MCP Client for Ollama. Featuring all core MCP primitives (tools, prompts, resources), agent mode, multi-server, model switching, streaming responses, human-in-the-loop, thinking mode, model params config, system prompts, and saved preferences.
Is MCP Client for Ollama safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare MCP Client for Ollama
How does it stack up against its Protocols & Tool Integration neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: MCP Client for Ollama scores 65.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #457 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.3/10; 77% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MCP Client for Ollama compares in Protocols & Tool Integration
- #22 Graft 65.7 +0.2
- #23 arcade-mcp 65.5 ±0
- #24 MCP Client for Ollama 65.5 this agent
- #25 GitHub MCP Server 65.4 −0.1
- #26 Serena 65.4 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Client for Ollama’s 65.5.
Where the 65.5 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Protocols & Tool Integration average
65.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMCP Client for Ollama Protocols & Tool Integration average (61 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
65.8 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about MCP Client for Ollama
Does MCP Client for Ollama publish package provenance?
Does MCP Client for Ollama have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MCP Client for Ollama actively maintained?
What license does MCP Client for Ollama use?
Are MCP Client for Ollama's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to MCP Client for Ollama's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain MCP Client for Ollama?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MCP Client for Ollama from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-client-for-ollama)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-client-for-ollama"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-client-for-ollama.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Protocols & Tool Integration
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON