Is MCP Bundles safe to use?

MCP Bundles has an HVTrust score of 52.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #530 of 1316 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for MCP Bundles?

MCP Bundles scores 52.8/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 2.1k GitHub stars and is categorized under Protocols & Tool Integration.

MCP Bundles

modelcontextprotocol/mcpb

Desktop Extensions: One-click local MCP server installation in desktop apps

Protocols & Tool Integration TypeScript Grade C Listed NOASSERTION

52.8/100

Rank #530 of 1316

Compare MCP Bundles

How does it stack up against its Protocols & Tool Integration neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-05-26 · 95d ago

Recent change

Rank +5

Is MCP Bundles safe? MCP Bundles scores 52.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #530 of 1316 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.1/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-05-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Protocols & Tool Integration

#33 Agent Reach — 58.0 (C) → #34 Figma Context MCP — 54.2 (C) → #36 FastMCP — 49.3 (D) → #37 MetaMCP — 47.4 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#516 → #526)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#504 → #516)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 60 spots (#444 → #504)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 95 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Bundles View Protocols & Tool Integration Report missing data

42.6

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#35

In Protocols & Tool Integration

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-29

Activity & Reach

Stars

2.1k

Forks

208

Last Push

2026-05-26

95 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼4

was #526

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Protocols & Tool Integration

52.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Bundles Protocols & Tool Integration average (61 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

12.6 / 25

3.4 above avg 9.2

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.8 below avg 11.6

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.7 / 17

1.7 above avg 12.0

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

5.7 / 20

8.4 below avg 14.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

8.0 / 20

2.3 below avg 10.3

Activity Inputs

42.6 / 100

StarsRepository reach

19.9 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

11.8 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

10.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

6.1 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 25, 2026

Signed Commits

100%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 5

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 9

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 9

Maintained 0

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 10

SAST 8

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 10

Vulnerabilities 0

Is MCP Bundles safe?

Public trust evidence for MCP Bundles is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does MCP Bundles publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Bundles. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does MCP Bundles have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

MCP Bundles has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is MCP Bundles actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 95 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does MCP Bundles use?

MCP Bundles ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are MCP Bundles's commits signed?

100% of the last 100 commits to MCP Bundles are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

MCP Bundles appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Bundles's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-24

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

Maintain MCP Bundles?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Bundles from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#516 → #526)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#504 → #516)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 60 spots (#444 → #504)

2026-08-24

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#427 → #443)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 16 spots (#446 → #430)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#429 → #443)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#439 → #428)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#411 → #426)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 14 spots (#425 → #411)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#406 → #424)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 101 spots (#303 → #404)

2026-07-15

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 6.6/10

2026-07-15

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank rose 151 spots (#403 → #252)

2026-07-15

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 34.3pts (21.8 → 56.1)

2026-07-14

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #403

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-bundles.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-bundles)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-bundles"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-bundles.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Protocols & Tool Integration

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON