Is MCP Adr Analysis Server safe to use?

MCP Adr Analysis Server has an HVTrust score of 77.8/100 (Grade B), ranked #176 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for MCP Adr Analysis Server?

MCP Adr Analysis Server scores 77.8/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 34 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

MCP Adr Analysis Server

tosin2013/mcp-adr-analysis-server

Your ADRs are lying to you. MCP server with live drift detection, content safety, and decision memory — validates architectural decisions against your actual code.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is MCP Adr Analysis Server safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

OSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10

Provenance Attested

Signed commits 19%

Last push yesterday

Compare MCP Adr Analysis Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: MCP Adr Analysis Server scores 77.8/100 (Grade B), ranked #176 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.9/10; 19% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How MCP Adr Analysis Server compares in MCP Servers

#94 Genexus18MCP 77.9 +0.1
#95 Aiven MCP 77.8 ±0
#96 MCP Adr Analysis Server 77.8 this agent
#97 Native DevTools 77.8 ±0
#98 The MCP server for GoReleaser 77.7 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Adr Analysis Server’s 77.8.

Where the 77.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

77.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Adr Analysis Server MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

15.8 / 25

5.5 above avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.5 / 17

1.3 above avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.9 / 20

7.9 above avg 12.0

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.7 / 20

in line with avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Recent Changes

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: OpenAI, OpenRouter, Postgres, Redis

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Adr Analysis Server View MCP Servers Report missing data

64.5

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#96

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-25

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

197

Downloads (7d)

995

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #176

Analysis

Activity Inputs

64.5 / 100

StarsRepository reach

9.3 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

5.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

npm attestation

OSSF Scorecard

5.9 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 26, 2026

Signed Commits

19%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 6

Dangerous-Workflow 0

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 7

SAST 10

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about MCP Adr Analysis Server

Public supply-chain signals for MCP Adr Analysis Server are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but MCP Adr Analysis Server carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.

Does MCP Adr Analysis Server publish package provenance?

Yes. MCP Adr Analysis Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does MCP Adr Analysis Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

MCP Adr Analysis Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is MCP Adr Analysis Server actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does MCP Adr Analysis Server use?

MCP Adr Analysis Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are MCP Adr Analysis Server's commits signed?

19% of the last 100 commits to MCP Adr Analysis Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

MCP Adr Analysis Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

4 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Adr Analysis Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: OpenAI, OpenRouter, Postgres, Redis

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-16

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-03

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Firecrawl

2026-09-03

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI

Maintain MCP Adr Analysis Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Adr Analysis Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: OpenAI, OpenRouter, Postgres, Redis

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 502 spots (#677 → #175)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 46.5pts (31.3 → 77.8)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #677

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-19

Rank Moved

Rank rose 16 spots (#199 → #183)

2026-09-16

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-16

Grade Changed

Trust grade A → B

2026-09-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 83 spots (#124 → #207)

2026-09-16

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 5.3pts (81.2 → 75.9)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#109 → #119)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 23 spots (#78 → #101)

2026-09-03

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Firecrawl

2026-09-03

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI

2026-09-03

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 5.3/10

2026-09-03

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → A

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 769 spots (#845 → #76)

2026-09-03

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 36.8pts (45.0 → 81.8)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 42 spots (#803 → #845)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#773 → #803)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#741 → #773)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#715 → #741)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#668 → #715)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#647 → #668)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 85 spots (#553 → #638)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#549 → #559)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#559 → #549)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#540 → #558)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#554 → #542)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#544 → #554)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#526 → #538)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#519 → #533)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #515

GitHub → npm: mcp-adr-analysis-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-adr-analysis-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-adr-analysis-server)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-adr-analysis-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-adr-analysis-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON