MCP Sap Gui
MCP server for SAP GUI for Windows automation via the SAP GUI Scripting API.
Is MCP Sap Gui safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare MCP Sap Gui
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: MCP Sap Gui scores 72.1/100 (Grade B), ranked #289 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; 7% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-20. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MCP Sap Gui compares in MCP Servers
- #169 Cursor History MCP 72.2 +0.1
- #170 MCP Server Tauri 72.2 +0.1
- #171 MCP Sap Gui 72.1 this agent
- #172 StackQL MCP Server 72.0 −0.1
- #173 Sentry MCP 71.9 −0.2
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Sap Gui’s 72.1.
Where the 72.1 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
72.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMCP Sap Gui MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
56.1 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about MCP Sap Gui
Does MCP Sap Gui publish package provenance?
Does MCP Sap Gui have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MCP Sap Gui actively maintained?
What license does MCP Sap Gui use?
Are MCP Sap Gui's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to MCP Sap Gui's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain MCP Sap Gui?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MCP Sap Gui from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-sap-gui)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-sap-gui"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-sap-gui.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON