updated 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC

MCP Sap Gui

Repository

MCP server that lets AI assistants work in SAP GUI for Windows: read screens and tables, fill in fields, run transactions. Saves wait for your approval.

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is MCP Sap Gui safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

OSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 26%
Last push 9d ago
Advisories None known
Compare MCP Sap Gui

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: MCP Sap Gui scores 79.4/100 (Grade B), ranked #191 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; 26% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (mcp-sap-gui); last pushed 2026-11-01. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How MCP Sap Gui could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships MCP Sap Gui and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/kts982/mcp-sap-gui, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-01. 26% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.5/10 (scanned Nov 9, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies7
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 0
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 7
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 4
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 10

  3. Published packages Linked and attested

    • PyPI mcp-sap-gui Source link points back to this repo Build provenance attested

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: mcp-sap-gui 0.6.0. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-10).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-23 Package provenance attestation detected
  • 2026-08-30 OSSF Scorecard: 5.5/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues MCP Sap Gui’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How MCP Sap Gui compares in MCP Servers

  1. #103 Claude Prompts MCP 79.8 +0.4
  2. #104 Simplenote MCP 79.5 +0.1
  3. #105 MCP Sap Gui 79.4 this agent
  4. #106 BLS OEWS 79.4 ±0
  5. #107 Excalidraw MCP 79.3 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Sap Gui’s 79.4.

Where the 79.4 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

79.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Sap Gui MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
15.7 / 25
4.9 above avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.3 above avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.2 / 17
0.9 above avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.2 / 20
7.0 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.3 / 20
in line with avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-11-07
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-11-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#173 → #184)
2026-10-31
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
64.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#105
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 9 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
47
Forks
16
Last Push
2026-11-01
9 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
87
Downloads (7d)
271
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼1
was #190

Analysis

Activity Inputs

64.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
10.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
24.3 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.7 / 20

Common questions about MCP Sap Gui

Public supply-chain signals for MCP Sap Gui are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but MCP Sap Gui carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does MCP Sap Gui publish package provenance?
Yes. MCP Sap Gui's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does MCP Sap Gui have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MCP Sap Gui has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MCP Sap Gui actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 9 days ago.
What license does MCP Sap Gui use?
MCP Sap Gui ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Sap Gui's commits signed?
26% of the last 100 commits to MCP Sap Gui are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Sap Gui appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Sap Gui's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-02
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic

Maintain MCP Sap Gui?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Sap Gui from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 28Grade 6HVTrust 5Score 2Scorecard 1Surface 1Delisted 1Listed 1Provenance 1MCP 1
2026-11-07
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-11-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#173 → #184)
2026-10-31
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-10-31
Rank Moved
Rank rose 19 spots (#176 → #157)
2026-10-29
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-10-28
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-10-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#188 → #176)
2026-10-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#194 → #184)
2026-10-18
Rank Moved
Rank rose 86 spots (#280 → #194)
2026-10-18
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.1pts (73.5 → 78.6)
2026-10-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#291 → #280)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank rose 21 spots (#318 → #297)
2026-10-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 84 spots (#404 → #320)
2026-10-06
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.3pts (67.5 → 70.8)
2026-10-06
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 9pts (50 → 59)
2026-10-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#351 → #397)
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#340 → #351)
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#286 → #317)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 503 spots (#791 → #288)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 43.3pts (28.9 → 72.2)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #791
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank rose 33 spots (#327 → #294)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#296 → #307)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#265 → #280)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 48 spots (#215 → #263)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#205 → #215)
2026-09-02
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#168 → #192)
2026-08-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.5/10
2026-08-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 233 spots (#401 → #168)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 11.5pts (59.4 → 70.9)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 151 spots (#552 → #401)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.3pts (51.1 → 59.4)
2026-08-29
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 22pts (30 → 53)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#540 → #552)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#525 → #540)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 69 spots (#456 → #525)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#440 → #453)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#455 → #442)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#440 → #454)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#451 → #439)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#425 → #439)
GitHub → PyPI: mcp-sap-gui

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 79.4 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-sap-gui.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-sap-gui)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-sap-gui"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-sap-gui.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON