Is MCP Sap Gui safe to use?

MCP Sap Gui has an HVTrust score of 70.6/100 (Grade B), ranked #215 of 1320 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for MCP Sap Gui?

MCP Sap Gui scores 70.6/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 28 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

MCP Sap Gui

kts982/mcp-sap-gui

MCP server for SAP GUI for Windows automation via the SAP GUI Scripting API.

MCP Servers Python Grade B Listed MIT

70.6/100

Rank #215 of 1320

Compare MCP Sap Gui

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-29 · 6d ago

Recent change

Rank +10

Is MCP Sap Gui safe? MCP Sap Gui scores 70.6/100 (Grade B), ranked #215 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; 6% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-29. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#105 Apple Mail MCP — 70.7 (B) → #106 Keboola MCP Server — 70.6 (B) → #108 Screaming Frog SEO Spider MCP Server — 70.6 (B) → #109 MCP Atlassian — 70.5 (B) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Recent Changes

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#205 → #215)

2026-09-02

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#168 → #192)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Sap Gui View MCP Servers Report missing data

52.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#107

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-08-29

6 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

143

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼10

was #205

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

70.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Sap Gui MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

14.7 / 25

5.1 above avg 9.6

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.2 / 17

1.4 above avg 11.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

16.3 / 20

4.1 above avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

6.4 / 20

in line with avg 6.3

Activity Inputs

52.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

8.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.2 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

14.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

4.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

pypi attestation

OSSF Scorecard

5.5 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 3, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 6

SAST 0

Security-Policy 4

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 10

Is MCP Sap Gui safe?

MCP Sap Gui has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does MCP Sap Gui publish package provenance?

Yes. MCP Sap Gui's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does MCP Sap Gui have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

MCP Sap Gui has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is MCP Sap Gui actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 6 day(s).

What license does MCP Sap Gui use?

MCP Sap Gui ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are MCP Sap Gui's commits signed?

6% of the last 100 commits to MCP Sap Gui are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

MCP Sap Gui appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

low confidence

Unknown

Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Sap Gui's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-02

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic

Maintain MCP Sap Gui?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Sap Gui from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#205 → #215)

2026-09-02

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#168 → #192)

2026-08-30

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 5.5/10

2026-08-30

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank rose 233 spots (#401 → #168)

2026-08-30

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 11.5pts (59.4 → 70.9)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank rose 151 spots (#552 → #401)

2026-08-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 8.3pts (51.1 → 59.4)

2026-08-29

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 22pts (30 → 53)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#540 → #552)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#525 → #540)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 69 spots (#456 → #525)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#440 → #453)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#455 → #442)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#440 → #454)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#451 → #439)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#425 → #439)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#437 → #425)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#420 → #438)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #418

GitHub → PyPI: mcp-sap-gui

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-sap-gui.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-sap-gui)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-sap-gui"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-sap-gui.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON