updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

MCP 1c Platform Tools

yellow-hammer/mcp-1c-platform-tools

MCP-сервер расширения 1C: Platform Tools для агентов Visual Studio Code (Cursor) по IPC.

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT
16.4/100
Rank #1209 of 1283
Compare MCP 1c Platform Tools

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-10 · 2d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is MCP 1c Platform Tools safe? MCP 1c Platform Tools scores 16.4/100 (Grade D), ranked #1209 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 46% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#704 Cli2mcp — 16.5 (D) → #705 MCP Eu Ai Act — 16.4 (D) → #707 Debridge MCP — 16.4 (D) → #708 DEVONthink MCP (istefox) — 16.3 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 74 spots (#1136 → #1210)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1133
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP 1c Platform Tools View MCP Servers Report missing data
58.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#706
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 2 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
29
Forks
7
Last Push
2026-08-10
2 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
42
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▲1
was #1210

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

16.4 / 100 · 40.0% confidence

MCP 1c Platform Tools MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
2.3 / 25
2.7 below avg 5.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.5 below avg 13.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
18.4 / 20
6.0 above avg 12.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
3.5 / 20
2.3 below avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

58.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
8.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
20.4 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
46%
of last 100 commits verified

Is MCP 1c Platform Tools safe?

Public trust evidence for MCP 1c Platform Tools is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does MCP 1c Platform Tools publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP 1c Platform Tools. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does MCP 1c Platform Tools have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for MCP 1c Platform Tools. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is MCP 1c Platform Tools actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).
What license does MCP 1c Platform Tools use?
MCP 1c Platform Tools ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP 1c Platform Tools's commits signed?
46% of the last 100 commits to MCP 1c Platform Tools are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain MCP 1c Platform Tools?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP 1c Platform Tools from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1Rank 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 74 spots (#1136 → #1210)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1133
GitHub → npm: mcp-1c-platform-tools

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 16.4 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-1c-platform-tools.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-1c-platform-tools)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-1c-platform-tools"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-1c-platform-tools.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON