Git MCP Server

A Git MCP server for AI agents. STDIO & Streamable HTTP.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed Apache-2.0

Is Git MCP Server safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 100%
Last push 33d ago
Compare Git MCP Server
Suggest a correction

In detail: Git MCP Server scores 56.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #752 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.1/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Git MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

  1. #417 Apollo.io 56.1 ±0
  2. #418 Webull OpenAPI 56.1 ±0
  3. #419 Git MCP Server 56.1 this agent
  4. #420 Awesome Copilot MCP Server 55.8 −0.3
  5. #421 Pgedge Postgres MCP 55.7 −0.4

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Git MCP Server’s 56.1.

Where the 56.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

56.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Git MCP Server MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
8.9 / 25
1.4 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.1 / 17
1.1 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
9.8 / 20
2.3 below avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.5 / 20
3.3 above avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 132 spots (#617 → #749)
2026-09-24
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 4.4pts (60.4 → 56.0)
2026-09-24
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 14pts (57 → 43)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 33 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
43.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#419

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 33 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
241
Forks
57
Last Push
2026-08-24
33 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
3,590
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
14
Rank Change
▲5
was #757

Analysis

Activity Inputs

43.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
14.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
20.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 22, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies -1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 4

Common questions about Git MCP Server

Git MCP Server has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Git MCP Server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Git MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Git MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Git MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Git MCP Server actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 33 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Git MCP Server use?
Git MCP Server ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Git MCP Server's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Git MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Git MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Git MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Git MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Git MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 23HVTrust 4Listed 2Score 2Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-09-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 132 spots (#617 → #749)
2026-09-24
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 4.4pts (60.4 → 56.0)
2026-09-24
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 14pts (57 → 43)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 387 spots (#1004 → #617)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 35.5pts (24.9 → 60.4)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1004
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#593 → #604)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#555 → #576)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#543 → #555)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#506 → #540)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#491 → #506)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#454 → #491)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 71 spots (#374 → #445)
2026-09-04
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.6/10
2026-09-04
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 680 spots (#1054 → #374)
2026-09-04
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 24.5pts (38.9 → 63.4)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 55 spots (#999 → #1054)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 204 spots (#1203 → #999)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 15.6pts (23.3 → 38.9)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#1169 → #1203)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#1133 → #1169)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#1090 → #1133)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#1049 → #1090)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1018 → #1049)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#997 → #1018)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 103 spots (#894 → #997)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 102 spots (#998 → #896)
2026-08-24
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 13pts (48 → 61)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#1006 → #995)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#976 → #1006)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 57 spots (#909 → #966)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #899

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 56.1 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/git-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/git-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/git-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/git-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON