Is mateclaw safe to use?

mateclaw has an HVTrust score of 51.0/100 (Grade C), ranked #900 of 1328 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for mateclaw?

mateclaw scores 51.0/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 1.1k GitHub stars and is categorized under Multi-Agent Systems.

mateclaw

mateaix/mateclaw

🤖 MateClaw — Your second brain with Multi-Agent Orchestration, MCP Protocol, Skills & Memory, Dream, and Multi-Channel S

Multi-Agent Systems Java Grade C Listed Apache-2.0

51.0/100

Rank #900 of 1328

Compare mateclaw

How does it stack up against its Multi-Agent Systems neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-18 · 0d ago

Recent change

Rank +2

Is mateclaw safe? mateclaw scores 51.0/100 (Grade C), ranked #900 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.2/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-09-18. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Multi-Agent Systems

#23 BettaFish — 52.0 (C) → #24 MiroFish — 51.6 (C) → #26 Swarm by OpenAI — 45.5 (D) → #27 MiroFlow — 42.9 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-13

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#913 → #902)

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#903 → #913)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#892 → #903)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for mateclaw View Multi-Agent Systems Report missing data

80.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#25

In Multi-Agent Systems

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-18

Activity & Reach

Stars

1.1k

Forks

333

Last Push

2026-09-18

today

Commits (4 wk)

147

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

161

Rank Change

▲8

was #908

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Multi-Agent Systems

51.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

mateclaw Multi-Agent Systems average (38 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

2.8 / 25

5.6 below avg 8.4

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

in line with avg 11.2

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

10.4 / 17

1.6 below avg 12.0

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

20.0 / 20

7.6 above avg 12.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.3 / 20

2.8 below avg 10.1

Activity Inputs

80.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

18.3 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

11.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

2.2 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 17, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests -1

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow -1

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions -1

Vulnerabilities 0

Is mateclaw safe?

Public trust evidence for mateclaw is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does mateclaw publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for mateclaw. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does mateclaw have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

mateclaw has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is mateclaw actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does mateclaw use?

mateclaw ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are mateclaw's commits signed?

0% of the last 100 commits to mateclaw are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

medium confidence

Declared

MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain mateclaw?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores mateclaw from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-13

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#913 → #902)

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#903 → #913)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#892 → #903)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 23 spots (#869 → #892)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#857 → #869)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#825 → #857)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#810 → #825)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 63 spots (#747 → #810)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#719 → #747)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 46 spots (#673 → #719)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#641 → #673)

2026-09-01

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 2.2/10

2026-09-01

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank rose 527 spots (#1168 → #641)

2026-09-01

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 28.2pts (23.3 → 51.5)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#1139 → #1168)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 44 spots (#1095 → #1139)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 33 spots (#1062 → #1095)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 35 spots (#1027 → #1062)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 23 spots (#1004 → #1027)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 94 spots (#910 → #1004)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#917 → #907)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#903 → #925)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#912 → #899)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 53 spots (#861 → #914)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 392 spots (#466 → #858)

2026-08-03

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #442

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mateclaw.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mateclaw)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mateclaw"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mateclaw.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Multi-Agent Systems

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON