LycheeMemory

Lightweight Long-Term Memory for LLM Agents.

Memory & Knowledge Python Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
48.1/100
Rank #466 of 1204
Compare LycheeMemory

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-06 · 3d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is LycheeMemory safe? LycheeMemory scores 48.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #466 of 1204 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.7/10; 7% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-06. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Memory & Knowledge

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 119 spots (#343 → #462)
2026-08-06
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (62 → 57)
2026-08-01
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
56.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#33

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-09 19:01 UTC · Repo last pushed 3 days ago

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.2k
Forks
17
Last Push
2026-08-06
3 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
3
Downloads (7d)
30
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼4
was #462

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Memory & Knowledge

48.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

LycheeMemory Memory & Knowledge average (38 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
3.7 / 25
6.9 below avg 10.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.5 below avg 12.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
10.8 / 17
1.9 below avg 12.7
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
14.2 / 20
3.3 below avg 17.5
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.4 / 20
4.7 below avg 14.1

Activity Inputs

56.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
18.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
7.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
2.7 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 8, 2026
Signed Commits
7%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies -1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 0

Is LycheeMemory safe?

Public trust evidence for LycheeMemory is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does LycheeMemory publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for LycheeMemory. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does LycheeMemory have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
LycheeMemory has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is LycheeMemory actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).
What license does LycheeMemory use?
LycheeMemory ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are LycheeMemory's commits signed?
7% of the last 100 commits to LycheeMemory are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
LycheeMemory appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
4 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain LycheeMemory?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores LycheeMemory from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 2Grade 2Listed 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1Score 1
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 119 spots (#343 → #462)
2026-08-06
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (62 → 57)
2026-08-01
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-07-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 2.7/10
2026-07-29
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 87 spots (#403 → #316)
2026-07-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 20.6pts (29.5 → 50.1)
2026-07-28
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #403

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 48.1 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/lycheememory.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/lycheememory)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/lycheememory"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/lycheememory.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Memory & Knowledge

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON