Is LiteFlow safe to use?

LiteFlow has an HVTrust score of 51.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #300 of 468 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for LiteFlow?

LiteFlow scores 51.7/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 3.8k GitHub stars and is categorized under Workflow Platforms.

LiteFlow

dromara/liteflow

Lightweight, fast, stable, programmable component-based rule engine — where AI Agents orchestrate just like ordinary com

Workflow Platforms Java Grade C Listed Apache-2.0

51.7/100

Rank #300 of 468

Compare LiteFlow

How does it stack up against its Workflow Platforms neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-07-31 · 6d ago

Recent change

No recent signal change

Is LiteFlow safe? LiteFlow scores 51.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #300 of 468 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.0/10; 1% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-31. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Workflow Platforms

#17 Astron Agent — 55.9 (C) → #18 Xpert AI — 55.4 (C) → #20 PromptFlow — 40.8 (D) → #21 Activepieces — 40.5 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-07-28

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-07-28

Rank Moved

Rank rose 42 spots (#333 → #291)

2026-07-28

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 6.4pts (45.8 → 52.2)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for LiteFlow View Workflow Platforms Report missing data

82.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#19

In Workflow Platforms

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-08-06

Activity & Reach

Stars

3.8k

Forks

522

Last Push

2026-07-31

6 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #300

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Workflow Platforms

51.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

LiteFlow Workflow Platforms average (23 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

3.8 / 25

6.6 below avg 10.4

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.9 below avg 11.7

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.1 / 17

1.3 below avg 12.4

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.3 / 20

1.1 above avg 18.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

8.6 / 20

4.5 below avg 13.1

Activity Inputs

82.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

21.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.2 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

24.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

12.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.0 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 4, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests -1

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow -1

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies -1

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions -1

Vulnerabilities 0

Is LiteFlow safe?

Public trust evidence for LiteFlow is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does LiteFlow publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for LiteFlow. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does LiteFlow have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

LiteFlow has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is LiteFlow actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 6 day(s).

What license does LiteFlow use?

LiteFlow ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are LiteFlow's commits signed?

1% of the last 100 commits to LiteFlow are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

3 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Extensions

Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain LiteFlow?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores LiteFlow from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-07-28

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-07-28

Rank Moved

Rank rose 42 spots (#333 → #291)

2026-07-28

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 6.4pts (45.8 → 52.2)

2026-07-28

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 19pts (64 → 83)

2026-07-19

Rank Moved

Rank rose 29 spots (#355 → #326)

2026-07-19

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 5.0pts (41.3 → 46.3)

2026-07-19

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 12pts (53 → 65)

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#331 → #356)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#313 → #331)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 36 spots (#277 → #313)

2026-07-02

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 6pts (61 → 55)

2026-06-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#237 → #249)

2026-06-30

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 6pts (70 → 64)

2026-06-24

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.0/10

2026-06-24

Rank Moved

Rank rose 59 spots (#294 → #235)

2026-06-24

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 27.8pts (21.7 → 49.5)

2026-06-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#283 → #294)

2026-06-21

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #279

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/liteflow.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/liteflow)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/liteflow"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/liteflow.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Workflow Platforms

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON