Xpert AI
Website
XpertAI is an open-source platform for building, running, and evolving ai agents, providing extensible capabilities and infrastructure for diverse AI systems.
Is Xpert AI safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Xpert AI
How does it stack up against its Workflow Platforms neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Xpert AI scores 56.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #801 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.6/10; 15% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-21. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Xpert AI could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 4.6 to 9.0lowest checks: CII-Best-Practices 0, Dependency-Update-Tool 0, Fuzzing 0 +9.2 → 65.5 B · #10 of 26
- Sign every commit15% signed today +4.3 → 60.6 C · #16 of 26
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Xpert AI and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.
-
Source Partly signed
github.com/xpert-ai/xpert, AGPL-3.0, last pushed 2026-10-21. 15% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Mixed
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.6/10 (scanned Oct 17, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review10
- Branch Protection5
- Signed Releases0
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies2
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 9Branch-Protection 5CI-Tests 10CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 10Contributors 6Dangerous-Workflow 10Dependency-Update-Tool 0Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 10Packaging 10Pinned-Dependencies 2SAST 0Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases 0Token-Permissions 0Vulnerabilities 0 -
Published packages None
No registry package. Xpert AI is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.
Changes to this chain
- 2026-07-29 OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads (missing)
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues Xpert AI’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.
How Xpert AI compares in Workflow Platforms
- #18 BISHENG 56.7 +0.4
- #19 Astron Agent 56.7 +0.4
- #20 Xpert AI 56.3 this agent
- #21 Superagent 54.4 −1.9
- #22 Coze Studio 50.4 −5.9
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Xpert AI’s 56.3.
Where the 56.3 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Workflow Platforms average
56.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceXpert AI Workflow Platforms average (26 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
75.1 / 100Common questions about Xpert AI
Does Xpert AI publish package provenance?
Does Xpert AI have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Xpert AI actively maintained?
What license does Xpert AI use?
Are Xpert AI's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- database
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain Xpert AI?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Xpert AI from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/xpert-ai)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/xpert-ai"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/xpert-ai.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Workflow Platforms
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON