Is Xpert AI safe to use?

Xpert AI has an HVTrust score of 57.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #359 of 1204 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Xpert AI?

Xpert AI scores 57.1/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 432 GitHub stars and is categorized under Workflow Platforms.

Xpert AI

xpert-ai/xpert

Xpert AI is an AI agents and data analysis platform for enterprises to make business decisions.

Workflow Platforms TypeScript Grade C Listed AGPL-3.0

57.1/100

Rank #359 of 1204

Compare Xpert AI

How does it stack up against its Workflow Platforms neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-09 · 0d ago

Recent change

Rank

Is Xpert AI safe? Xpert AI scores 57.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #359 of 1204 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.7/10; 29% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Workflow Platforms

#13 Budibase — 63.1 (C) → #14 InsForge — 61.8 (C) → #16 Julep — 56.7 (C) → #17 Coze Studio — 56.5 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 94 spots (#295 → #389)

2026-07-29

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10

2026-07-29

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Xpert AI View Workflow Platforms Report missing data

74.7

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#15

In Workflow Platforms

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Activity & Reach

Stars

432

Forks

Last Push

2026-08-09

today

Commits (4 wk)

300

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲30

was #389

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Workflow Platforms

57.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Xpert AI Workflow Platforms average (24 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.3 / 25

3.0 below avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.9 below avg 11.7

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.5 / 17

in line with avg 12.4

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

20.0 / 20

1.8 above avg 18.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

6.3 / 20

6.5 below avg 12.8

Activity Inputs

74.7 / 100

StarsRepository reach

15.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

8.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.7 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 9, 2026

Signed Commits

29%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 9

Branch-Protection 5

CI-Tests 0

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 10

Contributors 6

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 2

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Xpert AI safe?

Xpert AI has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Xpert AI publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Xpert AI. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Xpert AI have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Xpert AI has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Xpert AI actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Xpert AI use?

Xpert AI ships under AGPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Xpert AI's commits signed?

28% of the last 100 commits to Xpert AI are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Xpert AI appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

2 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Marketplace

Marketplace plugin/integration surface detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Xpert AI?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Xpert AI from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 94 spots (#295 → #389)

2026-07-29

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10

2026-07-29

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-07-29

Rank Moved

Rank rose 147 spots (#420 → #273)

2026-07-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 31.7pts (23.7 → 55.4)

2026-07-28

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #420

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/xpert-ai.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/xpert-ai)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/xpert-ai"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/xpert-ai.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Workflow Platforms

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON