Is Superagent safe to use?

Superagent has an HVTrust score of 55.0/100 (Grade C), ranked #416 of 1308 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Superagent?

Superagent scores 55.0/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 6.7k GitHub stars and is categorized under Workflow Platforms.

Superagent

homanp/superagent

Superagent protects your AI applications against prompt injections, data leaks, and harmful outputs. Embed safety direct

Workflow Platforms TypeScript Grade C Listed MIT

55.0/100

Rank #416 of 1308

Compare Superagent

How does it stack up against its Workflow Platforms neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade A · 4/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-24 · 1d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is Superagent safe? Superagent scores 55.0/100 (Grade C), ranked #416 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.5/10; 55% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Workflow Platforms

#17 Golem — 55.9 (C) → #18 Coze Studio — 55.4 (C) → #20 Julep — 54.6 (C) → #21 LiteFlow — 47.7 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 15 spots (#431 → #416)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#423 → #437)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#435 → #423)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Superagent View Workflow Platforms Report missing data

72.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#19

In Workflow Platforms

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-25

Activity & Reach

Stars

6.7k

Forks

964

Last Push

2026-08-24

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

7,233

npm+pypi

HN mentions (30d)

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #417

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Workflow Platforms

55.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Superagent Workflow Platforms average (24 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.1 / 25

3.1 below avg 10.2

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.9 below avg 11.7

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.5 / 17

0.9 below avg 12.4

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

15.3 / 20

3.0 below avg 18.3

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

14.3 / 20

1.4 above avg 12.9

Activity Inputs

72.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

23.0 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

10.5 / 25

CommunityFork signal

13.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.5 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 24, 2026

Signed Commits

55%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 3

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 2

Contributors 6

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 5

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Superagent safe?

Superagent has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Superagent publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Superagent. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Superagent have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Superagent has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Superagent actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Superagent use?

Superagent ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Superagent's commits signed?

55% of the last 100 commits to Superagent are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Superagent appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

low confidence

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Warning

1 package source mismatch detected

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Superagent's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-13

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

2026-07-10

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

2026-06-05

Drift Warning Raised

Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo

Maintain Superagent?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Superagent from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 15 spots (#431 → #416)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#423 → #437)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#435 → #423)

2026-08-15

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#436 → #426)

2026-08-13

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

2026-08-13

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank rose 153 spots (#589 → #436)

2026-08-13

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 11.0pts (41.6 → 52.6)

2026-08-13

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 26pts (45 → 71)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#563 → #587)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 180 spots (#381 → #561)

2026-07-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#362 → #372)

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#327 → #351)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#310 → #327)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 38 spots (#272 → #310)

2026-07-10

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

2026-06-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 34 spots (#206 → #240)

2026-06-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#190 → #206)

2026-06-18

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#156 → #168)

2026-06-16

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-06-15

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-06-14

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-06-05

Drift Warning Raised

Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo

2026-06-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#116 → #133)

2026-05-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 9.9pts (36.8 → 46.7)

GitHub → PyPI: superagent-py npm: safety-agent

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/superagent.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/superagent)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/superagent"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/superagent.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Workflow Platforms

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON