Superagent

Superagent protects your AI applications against prompt injections, data leaks, and harmful outputs. Embed safety direct

Workflow Platforms TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT
41.8/100
Rank #564 of 1204
Compare Superagent

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade A · 4/5 signals
Last push
2026-04-11 · 120d ago
Recent change
Rank +2

Is Superagent safe? Superagent scores 41.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #564 of 1204 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.6/10; 55% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-04-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Workflow Platforms

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 180 spots (#381 → #561)
2026-08-07
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-08-07
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 120 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
45.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#22

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-09 19:31 UTC · Repo last pushed 120 days ago

Activity & Reach

Stars
6.7k
Forks
965
Last Push
2026-04-11
120 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
7,233
npm+pypi
HN mentions (30d)
0
Open Issues
7
Rank Change
▼3
was #561

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Workflow Platforms

41.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Superagent Workflow Platforms average (24 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.0 / 25
4.3 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.9 below avg 11.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
10.7 / 17
1.7 below avg 12.4
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
4.0 / 20
14.2 below avg 18.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
14.3 / 20
1.5 above avg 12.8

Activity Inputs

45.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
23.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
8.3 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
2.6 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 9, 2026
Signed Commits
55%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 2
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 2
Contributors 6
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Superagent safe?

Public trust evidence for Superagent is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Superagent publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Superagent. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Superagent have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Superagent has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Superagent actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 120 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Superagent use?
Superagent ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Superagent's commits signed?
55% of the last 100 commits to Superagent are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Superagent appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Warning
1 package source mismatch detected
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Superagent's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-07
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-08-07
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI
2026-07-10
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI
2026-06-05
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-06-05
Drift Warning Raised
Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo

Maintain Superagent?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Superagent from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 9Grade 4HVTrust 2Surface 2Listed 1Scorecard 1Drift 1MCP 1Surface 1Stale 1Surface 1
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 180 spots (#381 → #561)
2026-08-07
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-08-07
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#362 → #372)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#327 → #351)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#310 → #327)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#272 → #310)
2026-07-10
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#206 → #240)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#190 → #206)
2026-06-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#156 → #168)
2026-06-16
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-06-15
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-06-14
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI
2026-06-05
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-06-05
Drift Warning Raised
Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo
2026-06-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#116 → #133)
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 9.9pts (36.8 → 46.7)
2026-05-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 2.8/10
2026-05-27
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-05-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 11.8pts (27.6 → 39.4)
2026-05-25
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #124

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 41.8 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/superagent.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/superagent)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/superagent"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/superagent.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Workflow Platforms

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON