updated 2026-10-16 16:07 UTC

Lineai MCP Server

Repository

An MCP Server to utilize Lineai's rich software dependency data in your AI programming assistant.

MCP Servers Python Listed MPL-2.0

Is Lineai MCP Server safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 56%
Last push 3d ago
Compare Lineai MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Lineai MCP Server scores 54.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #851 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.9/10; 56% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Lineai MCP Server could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Lineai MCP Server and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/lineai-intelligence/lineai-mcp-server, MPL-2.0, last pushed 2026-10-13. 56% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.9/10 (scanned Oct 10, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review2
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies2
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 2
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 2
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Lineai MCP Server is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-26 OSSF Scorecard: 5.5/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Lineai MCP Server’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Lineai MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

  1. #460 Nutrition MCP 54.8 +0.1
  2. #461 Licinexus MCP 54.7 ±0
  3. #462 Lineai MCP Server 54.7 this agent
  4. #463 Three.js DevTools MCP 54.7 ±0
  5. #464 FreeCAD MCP 54.6 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Lineai MCP Server’s 54.7.

Where the 54.7 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

54.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Lineai MCP Server MCP Servers average (781 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
8.9 / 25
1.6 below avg 10.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.7 below avg 13.5
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.7 / 17
in line with avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
16.5 / 20
4.2 above avg 12.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
3.8 / 20
3.6 below avg 7.4

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#829 → #844)
2026-10-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#843 → #829)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#816 → #831)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Lineai MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data
54.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#462
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-16 16:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 3 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-16

Activity & Reach

Stars
37
Forks
15
Last Push
2026-10-13
3 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
14
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
4
Rank Change
▼1
was #850

Analysis

Activity Inputs

54.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
9.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
14.7 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.6 / 20

Common questions about Lineai MCP Server

Public trust evidence for Lineai MCP Server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Lineai MCP Server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Lineai MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Lineai MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Lineai MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Lineai MCP Server actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).
What license does Lineai MCP Server use?
Lineai MCP Server ships under MPL-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Lineai MCP Server's commits signed?
56% of the last 100 commits to Lineai MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Lineai MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Lineai MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Lineai MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Lineai MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 27HVTrust 3Grade 3Listed 2Score 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-10-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#829 → #844)
2026-10-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#843 → #829)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#816 → #831)
2026-10-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 94 spots (#905 → #811)
2026-10-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-10-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 141 spots (#1046 → #905)
2026-10-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.3pts (46.5 → 51.8)
2026-10-05
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 19pts (33 → 51)
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1006 → #1032)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 412 spots (#572 → #984)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.7pts (35.5 → 48.2)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #572
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#938 → #948)
2026-09-11
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 82 spots (#850 → #932)
2026-09-11
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 8pts (44 → 36)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#822 → #842)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#778 → #814)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#752 → #778)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 81 spots (#671 → #752)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#648 → #671)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#659 → #648)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#627 → #659)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#604 → #627)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#574 → #604)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#532 → #568)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#510 → #523)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.5/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 494 spots (#1004 → #510)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 31.1pts (21.6 → 52.7)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#991 → #1002)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#988 → #999)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#995 → #985)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#966 → #995)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 25 spots (#979 → #954)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 58 spots (#914 → #972)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #906
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 54.7 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/lineai-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/lineai-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/lineai-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/lineai-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON