updated 2026-10-18 00:07 UTC

Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP

Repository Website

Google Ads MCP server + Meta Ads MCP (Facebook Ads MCP) + Google Analytics MCP (GA4) + Search Console in one hosted remote MCP for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor & n8n: OAuth login, no API keys, approval-gated writes, 7-day free trial. By Ryze AI.

MCP Servers Listed MIT

Is Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 5%
Last push 6d ago
Compare Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP scores 51.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #961 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.8/10; 5% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/irinabuht12-oss/google-ads-meta-ads-mcp, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-12. 5% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.8/10 (scanned Oct 10, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflown/a
    • Token Permissionsn/a
    • Pinned Dependenciesn/a
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests -1
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow -1
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies -1
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions -1
    Vulnerabilities 10

  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-02 OSSF Scorecard: 2.9/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #535 Codex MCP Go 51.7 +0.1
  2. #536 Quickbooks MCP 51.7 +0.1
  3. #537 Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP 51.6 this agent
  4. #538 Longbridge MCP 51.6 ±0
  5. #539 Newsmcp 51.6 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP’s 51.6.

Where the 51.6 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

51.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP MCP Servers average (781 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
5.0 / 25
5.6 below avg 10.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.8 below avg 13.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.7 / 17
0.6 below avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.2 / 20
1.0 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.9 / 20
1.5 above avg 7.4

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#945 → #955)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#926 → #937)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 60 spots (#854 → #914)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data
68.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#537
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-18 00:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 6 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-17

Activity & Reach

Stars
5.2k
Forks
369
Last Push
2026-10-12
6 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
5?
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼1
was #960

Analysis

Activity Inputs

68.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
22.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.2 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
9.7 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.9 / 20

Common questions about Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP

Public trust evidence for Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 6 day(s).
What license does Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP use?
Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP's commits signed?
5% of the last 100 commits to Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-02
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → none
2026-08-29
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed

Maintain Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Google/Meta Ads + GA4 MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 24HVTrust 4Listed 2Grade 2Score 1Fresh 1Scorecard 1Surface 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-10-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#945 → #955)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#926 → #937)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 60 spots (#854 → #914)
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#821 → #836)
2026-09-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#820 → #806)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 348 spots (#472 → #820)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.7pts (43.2 → 53.9)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #472
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 25 spots (#843 → #818)
2026-09-16
Rank Moved
Rank rose 52 spots (#887 → #835)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#867 → #879)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#852 → #867)
2026-09-09
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank rose 81 spots (#937 → #856)
2026-09-09
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.0pts (48.8 → 51.8)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#920 → #937)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#886 → #920)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#869 → #886)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#823 → #869)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#805 → #823)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#758 → #805)
2026-09-02
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → none
2026-09-02
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 2.9/10
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 463 spots (#1221 → #758)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 26.0pts (22.2 → 48.2)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#1193 → #1221)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#1174 → #1193)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#1158 → #1174)
2026-08-29
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 119 spots (#1277 → #1158)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.3pts (16.0 → 21.3)
2026-08-29
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 24pts (32 → 55)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#1241 → #1266)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#1208 → #1233)
2026-08-10
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1203
GitHub → Website →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 51.6 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/google-meta-ads-ga4-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/google-meta-ads-ga4-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/google-meta-ads-ga4-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/google-meta-ads-ga4-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON