Is Keenetic MCP safe to use?

Keenetic MCP has an HVTrust score of 67.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #358 of 1328 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Keenetic MCP?

Keenetic MCP scores 67.5/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 19 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Keenetic MCP

salatmaster/keenetic-mcp

Keenetic router control for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and any MCP agent. An MCP server over the router's own RCI API, p

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade B Listed MIT

67.5/100

Rank #358 of 1328

Compare Keenetic MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-09 · 30d ago

Recent change

Rank +15

Is Keenetic MCP safe? Keenetic MCP scores 67.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #358 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.6/10; 56% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#200 MCP Fiscal Brasil — 67.6 (B) → #201 MCP Ts Core — 67.6 (B) → #203 1password MCP — 67.5 (B) → #204 Docling MCP — 67.4 (B) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.

Recent Changes

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 45 spots (#313 → #358)

2026-09-08

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 6pts (38 → 32)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 61 spots (#252 → #313)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Keenetic MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

31.9

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#202

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-08

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-08-09

30 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼45

was #313

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

67.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Keenetic MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

16.0 / 25

6.1 above avg 9.9

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.4 / 17

in line with avg 12.0

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

10.0 / 20

2.2 below avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

5.4 / 20

1.5 below avg 6.9

Activity Inputs

31.9 / 100

StarsRepository reach

7.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

20.8 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

3.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

npm attestation

OSSF Scorecard

4.6 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 5, 2026

Signed Commits

56%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 7

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 1

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 2

SAST 0

Security-Policy 9

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 10

Vulnerabilities 9

Is Keenetic MCP safe?

Keenetic MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Keenetic MCP publish package provenance?

Yes. Keenetic MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does Keenetic MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Keenetic MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Keenetic MCP actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 30 days ago.

What license does Keenetic MCP use?

Keenetic MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Keenetic MCP's commits signed?

55% of the last 100 commits to Keenetic MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Keenetic MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

medium confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Keenetic MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-03

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → declared

Maintain Keenetic MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Keenetic MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 45 spots (#313 → #358)

2026-09-08

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 6pts (38 → 32)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 61 spots (#252 → #313)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 54 spots (#198 → #252)

2026-09-06

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 3.5pts (75.2 → 71.7)

2026-09-06

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 11pts (50 → 40)

2026-09-05

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank rose 600 spots (#798 → #198)

2026-09-05

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 25.8pts (49.4 → 75.2)

2026-09-04

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.6/10

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank rose 165 spots (#963 → #798)

2026-09-04

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 6.4pts (43.0 → 49.4)

2026-09-03

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → declared

2026-09-03

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → D

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 665 spots (#298 → #963)

2026-09-03

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 22.1pts (65.1 → 43.0)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#262 → #293)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#254 → #268)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#225 → #246)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#208 → #225)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#223 → #210)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#203 → #217)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#183 → #201)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 23 spots (#206 → #183)

2026-08-10

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #200

GitHub → npm: keenetic-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/keenetic-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/keenetic-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/keenetic-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/keenetic-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON