ITASCA MCP Server

MCP server connecting AI agents to ITASCA engines (PFC, FLAC, 3DEC, MPoint, MassFlow) — run geotechnical & geomechanics simulations through natural conversation

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is ITASCA MCP Server safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

OSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 65%
Last push yesterday
Compare ITASCA MCP Server
Suggest a correction

In detail: ITASCA MCP Server scores 76.1/100 (Grade B), ranked #206 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.6/10; 65% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How ITASCA MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

  1. #118 Growthbook MCP 76.1 ±0
  2. #119 Filesystem MCP 76.1 ±0
  3. #120 ITASCA MCP Server 76.1 this agent
  4. #121 Wireshark MCP 76.0 −0.1
  5. #122 MCP Server Trello 75.9 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks ITASCA MCP Server’s 76.1.

Where the 76.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

76.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

ITASCA MCP Server MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
15.2 / 25
4.9 above avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.6 / 17
0.6 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.4 / 20
7.3 above avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.9 / 20
2.7 above avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
68.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#120

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
196
Forks
19
Last Push
2026-09-25
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
73
Downloads (7d)
2,140
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
2
Rank Change
▼4
was #202

Analysis

Activity Inputs

68.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
13.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
23.3 / 25
CommunityFork signal
6.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
3.6 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 24, 2026
Signed Commits
65%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about ITASCA MCP Server

Public supply-chain signals for ITASCA MCP Server are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but ITASCA MCP Server carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does ITASCA MCP Server publish package provenance?
Yes. ITASCA MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does ITASCA MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
ITASCA MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is ITASCA MCP Server actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does ITASCA MCP Server use?
ITASCA MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are ITASCA MCP Server's commits signed?
65% of the last 100 commits to ITASCA MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
ITASCA MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to ITASCA MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain ITASCA MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores ITASCA MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 16Listed 2HVTrust 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Grade 1Provenance 1MCP 1
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 600 spots (#809 → #209)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 47.1pts (28.7 → 75.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #809
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#229 → #216)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#195 → #210)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#157 → #200)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#141 → #152)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#117 → #134)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.6/10
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 82 spots (#206 → #124)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 7.4pts (67.9 → 75.3)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#188 → #204)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#177 → #187)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#186 → #175)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#172 → #182)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#188 → #177)
2026-08-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#195 → #182)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#203 → #192)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#215 → #203)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#190 → #208)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #198

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 76.1 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/itasca-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/itasca-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/itasca-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/itasca-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON