JARVIS / HuggingGPT

JARVIS, a system to connect LLMs with ML community. Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.17580.pdf

Agent Frameworks Python Grade D Listed MIT
Compare → Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
36.2/100 · Grade D
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2025-07-29 · 347d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is JARVIS / HuggingGPT safe? JARVIS / HuggingGPT scores 36.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #302 of 328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.3/10; 55% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2025-07-29. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
36.2/100 · Grade D
Strongest Signal
Transparency
10.5/17
Weakest Signal
Maintenance
0/20
What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#261 → #296)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#240 → #261)
2026-06-22
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#229 → #240)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 347 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
41.9
Activity Score · out of 100
36.2
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#302
Global Rank · of 328
#70

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-07-11 04:00 UTC · Repo last pushed 347 days ago — may be stale

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-07-11

Activity & Reach

Stars
25.0k
Forks
2.2k
Last Push
2025-07-29
347 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
0
Open Issues
3506
Rank Change
=
was #302

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

36.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
5.6 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
10.5 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
0.0 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
10.6 / 20

Activity Inputs

41.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
26.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
15.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
2.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Jul 10, 2026
Signed Commits
55%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 0

Is JARVIS / HuggingGPT safe?

Public trust evidence for JARVIS / HuggingGPT is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does JARVIS / HuggingGPT publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for JARVIS / HuggingGPT. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does JARVIS / HuggingGPT have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
JARVIS / HuggingGPT has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is JARVIS / HuggingGPT actively maintained?
Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 347 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.
What license does JARVIS / HuggingGPT use?
JARVIS / HuggingGPT ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are JARVIS / HuggingGPT's commits signed?
55% of the last 100 commits to JARVIS / HuggingGPT are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

AI agent surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • code
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to JARVIS / HuggingGPT's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI

Maintain JARVIS / HuggingGPT?

HVTrust scores JARVIS / HuggingGPT from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Rank 7HVTrust 2Listed 1Grade 1Scorecard 1Surface 1
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#261 → #296)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#240 → #261)
2026-06-22
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#229 → #240)
2026-06-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#215 → #229)
2026-06-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#185 → #195)
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI
2026-06-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#162 → #176)
2026-06-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#143 → #162)
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.0pts (26.4 → 36.4)
2026-05-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 2.3/10
2026-05-27
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-05-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.8pts (11.5 → 22.3)
2026-05-25
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #143

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 36.2 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/jarvis-hugginggpt.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/jarvis-hugginggpt)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/jarvis-hugginggpt"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/jarvis-hugginggpt.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON