HyperAgent

AI Browser Automation

Needs review TypeScript Grade D Listed NOASSERTION
Compare → Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
43.1/100 · Grade D
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-05-11 · 76d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is HyperAgent safe? HyperAgent scores 43.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #346 of 418 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.8/10; 51% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-05-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
43.1/100 · Grade D
Strongest Signal
Transparency
11.7/17
Weakest Signal
Safety / Integrity
7.3/25
What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#315 → #340)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#298 → #315)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#263 → #298)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 76 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
44.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
43.1
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#346
Global Rank · of 418
#9

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-07-26 20:30 UTC · Repo last pushed 76 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-07-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.5k
Forks
183
Last Push
2026-05-11
76 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
15
Rank Change
▼1
was #345

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

43.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
7.3 / 25
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.7 / 17
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
6.9 / 20
Adoption60% stars · 40% downloads, log-scaled
7.6 / 20

Activity Inputs

44.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
19.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
14.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
10.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.8 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Jul 26, 2026
Signed Commits
51%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 4
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 5
Contributors 6
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 9
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 9
Vulnerabilities 0

Is HyperAgent safe?

Public trust evidence for HyperAgent is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does HyperAgent publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for HyperAgent. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does HyperAgent have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
HyperAgent has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is HyperAgent actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 76 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does HyperAgent use?
HyperAgent ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are HyperAgent's commits signed?
51% of the last 100 commits to HyperAgent are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Ranked neighbours in Needs review

AI agent surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
HyperAgent appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
3 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • browser
  • code
  • search
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain HyperAgent?

HVTrust scores HyperAgent from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Rank 7Listed 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#315 → #340)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#298 → #315)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#263 → #298)
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#222 → #254)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#204 → #222)
2026-06-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#185 → #195)
2026-06-19
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.8/10
2026-06-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 44 spots (#228 → #184)
2026-06-19
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 27.3pts (19.5 → 46.8)
2026-06-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #220

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 43.1 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/hyperagent.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/hyperagent)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/hyperagent"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/hyperagent.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Needs review

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON