Hound MCP

The dependency bloodhound for AI coding agents. Free, no API keys.

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade B Listed MIT
73.0/100
Rank #249 of 1328
Compare Hound MCP

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-02 · 6d ago
Recent change
Rank +5

Is Hound MCP safe? Hound MCP scores 73.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #249 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.3/10; 60% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#221 → #243)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#165 → #219)
2026-09-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
37.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#146

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-08 15:33 UTC · Repo last pushed 6 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-08

Activity & Reach

Stars
17
Forks
21
Last Push
2026-09-02
6 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0?
Downloads (7d)
37
npm
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
7
Rank Change
▼6
was #243

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

73.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Hound MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
18.4 / 25
8.5 above avg 9.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.9 / 17
1.9 above avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
11.6 / 20
0.6 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.1 / 20
1.8 below avg 6.9

Activity Inputs

37.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
7.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.2 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
6.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
6.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 7, 2026
Signed Commits
60%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 5
Contributors 6
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 9
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Hound MCP safe?

Hound MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Hound MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. Hound MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Hound MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Hound MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Hound MCP actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 6 day(s).
What license does Hound MCP use?
Hound MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Hound MCP's commits signed?
60% of the last 100 commits to Hound MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Hound MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Hound MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Hound MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 12HVTrust 2Listed 1Score 1Scorecard 1Grade 1
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#221 → #243)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#165 → #219)
2026-09-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 560 spots (#723 → #163)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 24.2pts (49.5 → 73.7)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#691 → #722)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#657 → #691)
2026-08-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 6.3/10
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 179 spots (#836 → #657)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.8pts (39.6 → 48.4)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 45 spots (#791 → #836)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#742 → #791)
2026-08-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 8pts (43 → 35)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#720 → #742)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 99 spots (#621 → #720)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#607 → #618)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#575 → #597)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #575

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 73.0 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/hound-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/hound-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/hound-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/hound-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON