Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt
MCP server for SAP BTP ABAP Cloud and On-Premise ECC/S/4HANA ABAP ADT with full CRUD, JWT/XSUAA, and service-key auth.
Is Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt scores 67.3/100 (Grade B), ranked #393 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.0/10; 85% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt compares in MCP Servers
- #232 Laravel Boost 67.4 +0.1
- #233 Better Telegram MCP 67.3 ±0
- #234 Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt 67.3 this agent
- #235 Pdf MCP 67.2 −0.1
- #236 Webcomponents MCP Server 67.2 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt’s 67.3.
Where the 67.3 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
67.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceFr0ster MCP Abap Adt MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
68.6 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt
Does Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt publish package provenance?
Does Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt actively maintained?
What license does Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt use?
Are Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Fr0ster MCP Abap Adt from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/fr0ster-mcp-abap-adt)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/fr0ster-mcp-abap-adt"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/fr0ster-mcp-abap-adt.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON