HAL
HAL (HTTP API Layer) is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides HTTP API capabilities to Large Language Models.
Is HAL safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare HAL
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: HAL scores 33.6/100 (Grade D), ranked #1259 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.2/10; 9% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2025-10-22. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How HAL compares in MCP Servers
- #752 ByteAsk Embedded MCP 33.7 +0.1
- #753 Chrome MCP Server 33.7 +0.1
- #754 HAL 33.6 this agent
- #755 A2asearch MCP 33.6 ±0
- #756 MCP Explorium 33.5 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks HAL’s 33.6.
Where the 33.6 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
33.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceHAL MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
13.7 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about HAL
Does HAL publish package provenance?
Does HAL have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is HAL actively maintained?
What license does HAL use?
Are HAL's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to HAL's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain HAL?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores HAL from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/hal)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/hal"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/hal.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON