MCP Apple Notes
An local mcp server for interacting with Apple Notes via LLM.
Is MCP Apple Notes safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare MCP Apple Notes
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
- Temporal Cortex Calendar MCP +1.4 higher
- MCP Toolbox for Databases +1.0 higher
- Hatago MCP Hub +0.9 higher
In detail: MCP Apple Notes scores 26.5/100 (Grade D), ranked #1308 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.2/10; 7% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2025-09-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MCP Apple Notes compares in MCP Servers
- #771 Temporal Cortex Calendar MCP 27.9 +1.4
- #772 MCP Toolbox for Databases 27.5 +1.0
- #773 Hatago MCP Hub 27.4 +0.9
- #774 MCP Apple Notes 26.5 this agent
- #775 Prometheus MCP Server 22.3 −4.2
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Apple Notes’s 26.5.
Where the 26.5 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
26.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMCP Apple Notes MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
14.7 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about MCP Apple Notes
Does MCP Apple Notes publish package provenance?
Does MCP Apple Notes have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MCP Apple Notes actively maintained?
What license does MCP Apple Notes use?
Are MCP Apple Notes's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to MCP Apple Notes's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain MCP Apple Notes?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MCP Apple Notes from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-apple-notes)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-apple-notes"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-apple-notes.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON