updated 2026-08-06 02:30 UTC

Habitat-Lab

facebookresearch/habitat-lab

A modular high-level library to train embodied AI agents across a variety of tasks and environments.

Robotics & Embodied Python Grade D Listed MIT
47.4/100
Rank #334 of 468
Compare Habitat-Lab

How does it stack up against its Robotics & Embodied neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-05-07 · 91d ago
Recent change
Stale

Is Habitat-Lab safe? Habitat-Lab scores 47.4/100 (Grade D), ranked #334 of 468 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.5/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-05-07. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Robotics & Embodied

#1 LeRobot — 89.3 (A) → #3 RoboOS — 33.7 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-05
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#321 → #331)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#288 → #310)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 91 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with LeRobot Get email alerts for Habitat-Lab View Robotics & Embodied Report missing data
46.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#2
In Robotics & Embodied

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-06 02:30 UTC · Repo last pushed 91 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-08-06

Activity & Reach

Stars
3.1k
Forks
684
Last Push
2026-05-07
91 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
256
Rank Change
=
was #334

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

47.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.6 / 25
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.3 / 17
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
5.9 / 20
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.4 / 20

Activity Inputs

46.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
20.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
12.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 5, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 6
CI-Tests 1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 8
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 1
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 9
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Habitat-Lab safe?

Public trust evidence for Habitat-Lab is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Habitat-Lab publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Habitat-Lab. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Habitat-Lab have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Habitat-Lab has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Habitat-Lab actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 91 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Habitat-Lab use?
Habitat-Lab ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Habitat-Lab's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Habitat-Lab are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Habitat-Lab head-to-head

Habitat-Lab vs LeRobot → Habitat-Lab vs RoboOS →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
2 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • code
  • shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Habitat-Lab's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-05
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days

Maintain Habitat-Lab?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Habitat-Lab from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 6Listed 1Stale 1
2026-08-05
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#321 → #331)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#288 → #310)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#275 → #288)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#241 → #275)
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#196 → #226)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#182 → #196)
2026-06-20
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #165
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 47.4 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/habitat-lab.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/habitat-lab)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/habitat-lab"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/habitat-lab.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Robotics & Embodied

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON