updated 2026-10-05 00:09 UTC

GZH Design Skill

Repository

把 Markdown 一键排成可直接粘进公众号编辑器的精致 HTML —— 6 套精选主题 + 主题生成器 + 双关卡校验。An AI-agent skill that turns Markdown into paste-ready WeChat article HTML.

Agent Skills HTML Listed NOASSERTION

Is GZH Design Skill safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 20%
Last push 2d ago
Compare GZH Design Skill

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: GZH Design Skill scores 49.4/100 (Grade D), ranked #241 of 359 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.5/10; 20% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-03. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How GZH Design Skill could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships GZH Design Skill and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/isjiamu/gzh-design-skill, NOASSERTION, last pushed 2026-10-03. 20% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.5/10 (scanned Oct 4, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review4
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflown/a
    • Token Permissionsn/a
    • Pinned Dependenciesn/a
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 0
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 4
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow -1
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 9
    Maintained 5
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies -1
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions -1
    Vulnerabilities 10

  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. GZH Design Skill is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-10-04 OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues GZH Design Skill’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How GZH Design Skill compares in Agent Skills

  1. #239 Claude Code Skills 49.4 ±0
  2. #240 Spring Boot Skills 49.4 ±0
  3. #241 GZH Design Skill 49.4 this agent
  4. #242 Finance Skills 49.4 ±0
  5. #243 Jezweb Claude Skills 49.3 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks GZH Design Skill’s 49.4.

Where the 49.4 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

49.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

GZH Design Skill Agent Skills average (359 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
5.4 / 25
2.6 below avg 8.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.5 / 17
0.7 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.1 / 20
1.0 below avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.6 / 20
in line with avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-04
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10
2026-10-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 113 spots (#357 → #244)
2026-10-04
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.3pts (21.1 → 49.4)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for GZH Design Skill View Agent Skills Report missing data
66.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#241
In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-05 00:09 UTC · Repo last pushed 2 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
3.9k
Forks
434
Last Push
2026-10-03
2 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
3?
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
7
Rank Change
▲3
was #244

Analysis

Activity Inputs

66.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
21.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
7.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.3 / 20

Common questions about GZH Design Skill

Public trust evidence for GZH Design Skill is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does GZH Design Skill publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for GZH Design Skill. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does GZH Design Skill have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
GZH Design Skill has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is GZH Design Skill actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).
What license does GZH Design Skill use?
GZH Design Skill ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are GZH Design Skill's commits signed?
20% of the last 100 commits to GZH Design Skill are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain GZH Design Skill?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores GZH Design Skill from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
HVTrust 2Listed 1Score 1Rank 1Scorecard 1
2026-10-04
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10
2026-10-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 113 spots (#357 → #244)
2026-10-04
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.3pts (21.1 → 49.4)
2026-10-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.0pts (17.1 → 21.1)
2026-10-03
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 19pts (47 → 66)
2026-09-29
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #358
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 49.4 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/gzh-design-skill.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/gzh-design-skill)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/gzh-design-skill"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/gzh-design-skill.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON