GPT Researcher
An autonomous agent that conducts deep research on any data using any LLM providers
Compare GPT Researcher
How does it stack up against its Research & Data neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Is GPT Researcher safe? GPT Researcher scores 69.8/100 (Grade B), ranked #147 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.2/10; 23% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
Ranked neighbours in Research & Data
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions vs Research & Data
69.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceGPT Researcher Research & Data average (32 agents)
Activity Inputs
86.8 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Is GPT Researcher safe?
Does GPT Researcher publish package provenance?
Does GPT Researcher have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is GPT Researcher actively maintained?
What license does GPT Researcher use?
Are GPT Researcher's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Compare GPT Researcher head-to-head
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- browser
- search
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to GPT Researcher's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain GPT Researcher?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores GPT Researcher from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/gpt-researcher)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/gpt-researcher"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/gpt-researcher.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Research & Data
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON