GPT Researcher

An autonomous agent that conducts deep research on any data using any LLM providers

Research & Data Python Listed Apache-2.0

Is GPT Researcher safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 47%
Last push 8d ago
Advisories None known
Compare GPT Researcher
Suggest a correction

In detail: GPT Researcher scores 67.9/100 (Grade B), ranked #408 of 1371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.2/10; 47% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (gpt-researcher); last pushed 2026-10-01. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How GPT Researcher could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships GPT Researcher and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/assafelovic/gpt-researcher, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2026-10-01. 47% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 6.2/10 (scanned Aug 18, 2026, refresh pending). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review1
    • Branch Protection6
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 6
    CI-Tests 8
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 1
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 10
  3. Published packages Not linked

    • PyPI gpt-researcher Source link isn't a GitHub repo No build attestation

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: gpt-researcher 0.16.1. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-10-09).

Changes to this chain

No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of GPT Researcher.

Evidence behind this score

Coverage A: 4 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues GPT Researcher’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How GPT Researcher compares in Research & Data

  1. #6 Feynman 72.9 +5.0
  2. #7 Crawl4AI 70.6 +2.7
  3. #8 GPT Researcher 67.9 this agent
  4. #9 DeerFlow 67.5 −0.4
  5. #10 Vibe-Trading 63.9 −4.0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks GPT Researcher’s 67.9.

Where the 67.9 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Research & Data average

67.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

GPT Researcher Research & Data average (37 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.1 / 25
1.9 above avg 8.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.2 below avg 12.0
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.8 / 17
2.3 above avg 11.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.1 / 20
5.9 above avg 13.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
16.0 / 20
5.1 above avg 10.9

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#397 → #408)
2026-10-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#380 → #390)
2026-09-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 61 spots (#306 → #367)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
91.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#8

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-09 16:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 8 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-09

Activity & Reach

Stars
30.0k
Forks
4.1k
Last Push
2026-10-01
8 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
83
Downloads (7d)
8,108
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
0
Open Issues
7
Rank Change
▼11
was #397

Analysis

Activity Inputs

91.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
26.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
24.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
16.8 / 20

Common questions about GPT Researcher

GPT Researcher has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does GPT Researcher publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for GPT Researcher. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does GPT Researcher have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
GPT Researcher has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is GPT Researcher actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 8 days ago.
What license does GPT Researcher use?
GPT Researcher ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are GPT Researcher's commits signed?
47% of the last 100 commits to GPT Researcher are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare GPT Researcher head-to-head

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
GPT Researcher appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
5 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • browser
  • search
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to GPT Researcher's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-07-17
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Multi-provider (LiteLLM)

Maintain GPT Researcher?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores GPT Researcher from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 22Score 5HVTrust 4Grade 4Surface 1
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#397 → #408)
2026-10-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#380 → #390)
2026-09-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 61 spots (#306 → #367)
2026-09-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-09-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 278 spots (#584 → #306)
2026-09-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 9.8pts (61.6 → 71.4)
2026-09-26
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 29pts (65 → 93)
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 426 spots (#162 → #588)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 5.1pts (66.6 → 61.5)
2026-09-23
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 16pts (80 → 65)
2026-09-22
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#142 → #162)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 232 spots (#374 → #142)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#333 → #345)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#308 → #327)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 58 spots (#242 → #300)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#231 → #242)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#217 → #231)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#184 → #211)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#176 → #186)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#147 → #164)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#135 → #147)
2026-08-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-08-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 148 spots (#283 → #135)
2026-08-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.2pts (62.0 → 70.2)
2026-08-23
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 23pts (64 → 87)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#300 → #283)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#281 → #295)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#294 → #280)
2026-08-13
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 151 spots (#132 → #283)
2026-08-13
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 7.2pts (69.8 → 62.6)
2026-08-13
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 22pts (87 → 65)
2026-07-17
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#74 → #87)
2026-07-14
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 6pts (86 → 93)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 67.9 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/gpt-researcher.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/gpt-researcher)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/gpt-researcher"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/gpt-researcher.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Research & Data

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON