RegistryCompare › DeerFlow vs GPT Researcher

DeerFlow vs GPT Researcher

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DeerFlow and GPT Researcher, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

GPT Researcher leads on trust — 68.0/100 (Grade B) vs 67.3/100 (Grade B), a 0.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal DeerFlowbytedance/deer-flow GPT Researcherassafelovic/gpt-researcher
HVTrust score 67.3 68.0
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade C A
Overall rank #386 #370
Rank in Research & Data #8 #7
GitHub stars 82.7k 29.5k
Last updated today 22d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10 6.2 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 8k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.1 8.9
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.0 13.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 16.4
Adoption / 20 11.8 16.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 6 — E2B, OpenAI, OpenRouter, … 5 — Firecrawl, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), …
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → DeerFlow profile GPT Researcher profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →