Gemini MCP

MCP Server that enables Claude code to interact with Gemini

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Gemini MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 29%
Last push 80d ago
Compare Gemini MCP
Suggest a correction

In detail: Gemini MCP scores 48.4/100 (Grade D), ranked #985 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.3/10; 29% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-08. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Gemini MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #573 Meta Ads MCP 48.5 +0.1
  2. #574 Bitrise 48.4 ±0
  3. #575 Gemini MCP 48.4 this agent
  4. #576 One Search MCP 48.3 −0.1
  5. #577 Tugcantopaloglu Godot MCP 48.3 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Gemini MCP’s 48.4.

Where the 48.4 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

48.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Gemini MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
5.6 / 25
4.7 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.3 / 17
0.9 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
6.7 / 20
5.4 below avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.0 / 20
1.8 above avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#971 → #982)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 80 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
35.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#575

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 80 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
219
Forks
46
Last Push
2026-07-08
80 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
322
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
5
Rank Change
▼3
was #982

Analysis

Activity Inputs

35.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
14.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
13.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
7.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 11, 2026 (refresh pending)
Signed Commits
29%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 3
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 1
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies -1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Gemini MCP

Public trust evidence for Gemini MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Gemini MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Gemini MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Gemini MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Gemini MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Gemini MCP actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 80 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Gemini MCP use?
Gemini MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Gemini MCP's commits signed?
29% of the last 100 commits to Gemini MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Gemini MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Gemini MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Gemini MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Gemini MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 21HVTrust 3Listed 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#971 → #982)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 204 spots (#1174 → #970)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.5pts (20.1 → 48.6)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1174
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#941 → #953)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#937 → #949)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#914 → #929)
2026-09-08
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.3/10
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 352 spots (#1266 → #914)
2026-09-08
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 19.3pts (30.2 → 49.5)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1256 → #1266)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#1239 → #1256)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#1220 → #1239)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 78 spots (#1298 → #1220)
2026-09-04
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 11.5pts (18.8 → 30.3)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#1285 → #1298)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#1271 → #1285)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#1256 → #1271)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1238 → #1256)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1220 → #1238)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#1207 → #1220)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#1190 → #1207)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#1178 → #1190)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 51 spots (#1127 → #1178)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1099 → #1125)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 62 spots (#1036 → #1098)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1029

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 48.4 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/gemini-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/gemini-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/gemini-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/gemini-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON