Is Edinet MCP safe to use?

Edinet MCP has an HVTrust score of 68.3/100 (Grade B), ranked #371 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Edinet MCP?

Edinet MCP scores 68.3/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 18 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Edinet MCP

ajtgjmdjp/edinet-mcp

EDINET XBRL parsing library and MCP server for Japanese financial data

MCP Servers Python Listed Apache-2.0

Is Edinet MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10

Provenance Attested

Signed commits 7%

Last push 12d ago

Compare Edinet MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Edinet MCP scores 68.3/100 (Grade B), ranked #371 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.6/10; 7% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Edinet MCP compares in MCP Servers

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Edinet MCP’s 68.3.

Where the 68.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

68.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Edinet MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

14.8 / 25

4.5 above avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.3 / 17

1.1 above avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

11.2 / 20

0.9 below avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

6.0 / 20

1.2 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Recent Changes

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Edinet MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

35.2

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#225

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-14

12 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

156

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #372

Analysis

Activity Inputs

35.2 / 100

StarsRepository reach

7.7 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

23.3 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

4.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

pypi attestation

OSSF Scorecard

5.6 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 26, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 5

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 10

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Edinet MCP

Edinet MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Edinet MCP publish package provenance?

Yes. Edinet MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does Edinet MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Edinet MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Edinet MCP actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 12 days ago.

What license does Edinet MCP use?

Edinet MCP ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Edinet MCP's commits signed?

6% of the last 100 commits to Edinet MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Edinet MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

low confidence

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Edinet MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Edinet MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Edinet MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 647 spots (#1006 → #359)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 43.8pts (24.8 → 68.6)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1006

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#301 → #315)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#272 → #293)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 63 spots (#201 → #264)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#177 → #187)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank rose 21 spots (#198 → #177)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#172 → #198)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#167 → #177)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 5.6/10

2026-08-26

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 203 spots (#358 → #155)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 11.9pts (58.9 → 70.8)

2026-08-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 22 spots (#371 → #349)

2026-08-23

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 6pts (40 → 45)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 16 spots (#387 → #371)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#361 → #380)

2026-08-18

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 5pts (45 → 40)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#328 → #360)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#311 → #323)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 17 spots (#328 → #311)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#298 → #327)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #294

GitHub → PyPI: edinet-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/edinet-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/edinet-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/edinet-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/edinet-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON