Cursor History MCP
MCP server for browsing, searching, and exporting Cursor AI chat history.
Is Cursor History MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Cursor History MCP
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Cursor History MCP scores 68.8/100 (Grade B), ranked #386 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (cursor-history-mcp); last pushed 2026-09-08. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Cursor History MCP could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 3.9 to 9.0lowest checks: Branch-Protection 0, CI-Tests 0, CII-Best-Practices 0 +10.7 → 79.5 B · #91 of 781
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Cursor History MCP and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.
-
Source Signed
github.com/S2thend/cursor-history-mcp, MIT, last pushed 2026-09-08. 100% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.
-
Review and release Weak
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.9/10 (scanned Oct 13, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review0
- Branch Protection0
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions9
- Pinned Dependencies2
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 0CI-Tests 0CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 0Contributors 6Dangerous-Workflow 10Dependency-Update-Tool 0Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 4Packaging 10Pinned-Dependencies 2SAST 0Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions 9Vulnerabilities 1 -
Published packages Linked and attested
- npm cursor-history-mcp Source link points back to this repo Build provenance attested
-
What you install today No known advisories
Latest release checked: cursor-history-mcp 0.3.1. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-10-16).
Changes to this chain
- 2026-09-23 Package provenance attestation detected
- 2026-08-26 OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues Cursor History MCP’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.
How Cursor History MCP compares in MCP Servers
- #228 Brave Search MCP Server 68.8 ±0
- #229 Edinet MCP 68.8 ±0
- #230 Cursor History MCP 68.8 this agent
- #231 Agrobr MCP 68.7 −0.1
- #232 Whoop MCP 68.6 −0.2
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Cursor History MCP’s 68.8.
Where the 68.8 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
68.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceCursor History MCP MCP Servers average (781 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
31.3 / 100Common questions about Cursor History MCP
Does Cursor History MCP publish package provenance?
Does Cursor History MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Cursor History MCP actively maintained?
What license does Cursor History MCP use?
Are Cursor History MCP's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Cursor History MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Cursor History MCP?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Cursor History MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/cursor-history-mcp)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/cursor-history-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/cursor-history-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON