Is Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global safe to use?

Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global has an HVTrust score of 47.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #1014 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global?

Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global scores 47.3/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 82 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global

DIDA-AI/Dida-RollingGo-Hotel-MCP-Global

Official DIDA Hotel Booking MCP Server. 14-year travel tech data stack, 2M+ hotels at wholesale rates, 40+ LLM compatible. Free unlimited calls for businesses & individual devs. Filter by location, date, star grade, guests & tags; pull real-time room types, pricing & cancellation rules.

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 80%

Last push 18d ago

Compare Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global scores 47.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #1014 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.7/10; 80% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-08. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global compares in MCP Servers

#592 Markifact: AI Performance Marketing 47.4 +0.1
#593 Simplenote MCP 47.3 ±0
#594 Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global 47.3 this agent
#595 MCP Brasil 47.2 −0.1
#596 UnrealMCP — AI Bridge for Unreal Engine 5 47.1 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global’s 47.3.

Where the 47.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

47.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.4 / 25

2.9 below avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

10.8 / 17

1.4 below avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

12.0 / 20

in line with avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

4.6 / 20

2.6 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 387 spots (#615 → #1002)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global View MCP Servers Report missing data

41.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#594

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-08

18 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼3

was #1011

Analysis

Activity Inputs

41.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

11.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

22.5 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

3.8 / 25

CommunityFork signal

3.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

2.7 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 5, 2026 (refresh pending)

Signed Commits

80%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests -1

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow -1

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies -1

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions -1

Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global

Public trust evidence for Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 18 days ago.

What license does Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global use?

Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global's commits signed?

79% of the last 100 commits to Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Dida RollingGo Hotel MCP Global from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 387 spots (#615 → #1002)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 14.1pts (33.4 → 47.5)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #615

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#987 → #997)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#975 → #987)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#963 → #975)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank rose 54 spots (#1017 → #963)

2026-09-08

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 3.0pts (44.9 → 47.9)

2026-09-08

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 9pts (35 → 44)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#985 → #1017)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#969 → #985)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 43 spots (#926 → #969)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 33 spots (#893 → #926)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 124 spots (#769 → #893)

2026-09-03

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 8pts (43 → 35)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 45 spots (#724 → #769)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#694 → #724)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 35 spots (#659 → #694)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 23 spots (#636 → #659)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#596 → #636)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#574 → #596)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#548 → #574)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 2.7/10

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 393 spots (#941 → #548)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 26.5pts (22.6 → 49.1)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#929 → #942)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#936 → #925)

2026-08-20

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 23 spots (#920 → #943)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#906 → #920)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#887 → #915)

2026-08-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 35 spots (#855 → #890)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#825 → #855)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 46 spots (#786 → #832)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #779

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/dida-rollinggo-hotel-mcp-global.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/dida-rollinggo-hotel-mcp-global)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/dida-rollinggo-hotel-mcp-global"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/dida-rollinggo-hotel-mcp-global.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON