Cyberbro MCP Server

Using MCP is fun with Cyberbro!

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is Cyberbro MCP Server safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 42%
Last push 53d ago
Compare Cyberbro MCP Server
Suggest a correction

In detail: Cyberbro MCP Server scores 63.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #514 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.1/10; 42% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Cyberbro MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

  1. #295 iCloud MCP 63.9 +0.1
  2. #296 Glade MCP 63.9 +0.1
  3. #297 Cyberbro MCP Server 63.8 this agent
  4. #298 MITRE ATT&CK 63.6 −0.2
  5. #299 Unity API Documentation 63.6 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Cyberbro MCP Server’s 63.8.

Where the 63.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

63.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Cyberbro MCP Server MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
14.7 / 25
4.4 above avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.0 / 17
in line with avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
8.5 / 20
3.6 below avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
4.9 / 20
2.3 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-09-24
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-24
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-24
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 53 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
30.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#297

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 53 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
19
Forks
10
Last Push
2026-08-04
53 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
21
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
4
Rank Change
▲2
was #516

Analysis

Activity Inputs

30.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
7.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
17.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
4.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 23, 2026
Signed Commits
42%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 1
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 3
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Cyberbro MCP Server

Cyberbro MCP Server has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Cyberbro MCP Server publish package provenance?
Yes. Cyberbro MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Cyberbro MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Cyberbro MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Cyberbro MCP Server actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 53 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Cyberbro MCP Server use?
Cyberbro MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Cyberbro MCP Server's commits signed?
41% of the last 100 commits to Cyberbro MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Cyberbro MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Cyberbro MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-24
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-24
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-24
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Cyberbro MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Cyberbro MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 22Listed 2HVTrust 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Grade 1Provenance 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-09-24
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-24
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-24
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 42 spots (#553 → #511)
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 590 spots (#1143 → #553)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 41.6pts (20.8 → 62.4)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1143
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-16
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.1/10
2026-09-16
Rank Moved
Rank rose 266 spots (#757 → #491)
2026-09-16
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.5pts (55.5 → 64.0)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#727 → #742)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#714 → #727)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 79 spots (#613 → #692)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#600 → #613)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 70 spots (#530 → #600)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#508 → #530)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#469 → #508)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#455 → #469)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#441 → #455)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#405 → #441)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 20 spots (#425 → #405)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#408 → #425)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 40 spots (#357 → #397)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#334 → #351)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#349 → #334)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#331 → #351)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#319 → #337)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#334 → #319)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#314 → #333)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #310

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 63.8 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/cyberbro-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/cyberbro-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/cyberbro-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/cyberbro-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON