Is ClawRouter safe to use?

ClawRouter has an HVTrust score of 59.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #640 of 1328 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for ClawRouter?

ClawRouter scores 59.3/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 6.6k GitHub stars and is categorized under LLM Gateways & Infra.

ClawRouter

BlockRunAI/ClawRouter

The agent-native LLM router for autonomous agents. Every frontier model behind one wallet, <1ms local routing, USDC paym

LLM Gateways & Infra TypeScript Grade C Listed MIT

59.3/100

Rank #640 of 1328

Compare ClawRouter

How does it stack up against its LLM Gateways & Infra neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-16 · 4d ago

Recent change

No recent signal change

Is ClawRouter safe? ClawRouter scores 59.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #640 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.9/10; 36% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-16. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in LLM Gateways & Infra

#7 Jan — 66.6 (B) → #8 LLM Gateway — 63.8 (C) → #10 claude-code-router — 58.8 (C) → #11 Portkey AI Gateway — 53.5 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#617 → #630)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#605 → #617)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#589 → #599)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for ClawRouter View LLM Gateways & Infra Report missing data

85.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

In LLM Gateways & Infra

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-20

Activity & Reach

Stars

6.6k

Forks

651

Last Push

2026-09-16

4 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

108

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼8

was #632

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs LLM Gateways & Infra

59.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

ClawRouter LLM Gateways & Infra average (14 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.9 / 25

1.8 below avg 9.7

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.5 below avg 11.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.7 / 17

in line with avg 12.6

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.7 / 20

2.5 above avg 17.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

9.2 / 20

4.1 below avg 13.3

Activity Inputs

85.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

22.9 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.4 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

13.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.9 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 13, 2026

Signed Commits

36%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 8

CI-Tests 8

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 2

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is ClawRouter safe?

ClawRouter has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does ClawRouter publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for ClawRouter. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does ClawRouter have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

ClawRouter has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is ClawRouter actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 4 day(s).

What license does ClawRouter use?

ClawRouter ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are ClawRouter's commits signed?

36% of the last 100 commits to ClawRouter are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

DeepSeek

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to ClawRouter's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-03

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: DeepSeek

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none

2026-08-12

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic, DeepSeek, OpenAI

Maintain ClawRouter?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores ClawRouter from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#617 → #630)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#605 → #617)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#589 → #599)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#542 → #589)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 65 spots (#468 → #533)

2026-09-03

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: DeepSeek

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 92 spots (#373 → #465)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank rose 17 spots (#398 → #381)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#376 → #398)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank rose 19 spots (#395 → #376)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#379 → #389)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 5.5/10

2026-08-26

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 498 spots (#877 → #379)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 35.6pts (23.9 → 59.5)

2026-08-21

Rank Moved

Rank rose 18 spots (#898 → #880)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#884 → #901)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#896 → #885)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#870 → #896)

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none

2026-08-12

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic, DeepSeek, OpenAI

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 117 spots (#972 → #855)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 59 spots (#906 → #965)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 356 spots (#452 → #808)

2026-08-06

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #462

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/clawrouter.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/clawrouter)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/clawrouter"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/clawrouter.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in LLM Gateways & Infra

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON