Chroma

Search infrastructure for AI

Memory & Knowledge Rust Grade B Listed Apache-2.0
74.3/100
Rank #93 of 1204
Compare Chroma

How does it stack up against its Memory & Knowledge neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade A · 4/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-07 · 2d ago
Recent change
Provider Added

Is Chroma safe? Chroma scores 74.3/100 (Grade B), ranked #93 of 1204 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.4/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-07. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Memory & Knowledge

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-07
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Cohere, Google Gemini
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
88.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#9

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-09 19:31 UTC · Repo last pushed 2 days ago

Activity & Reach

Stars
29.0k
Forks
2.4k
Last Push
2026-08-07
2 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
46
Downloads (7d)
2,853,173
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
2
Open Issues
333
Rank Change
▼1
was #92

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Memory & Knowledge

74.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Chroma Memory & Knowledge average (38 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.5 / 25
in line with avg 10.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.5 below avg 12.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.2 / 17
in line with avg 12.7
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
18.5 / 20
1.0 above avg 17.5
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
19.3 / 20
5.2 above avg 14.1

Activity Inputs

88.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
26.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
20.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
15.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.4 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 8, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 9
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Chroma safe?

Chroma has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Chroma publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Chroma. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Chroma have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Chroma has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Chroma actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).
What license does Chroma use?
Chroma ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Chroma's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Chroma are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
3 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Chroma's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-07
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Cohere, Google Gemini
2026-06-26
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI

Maintain Chroma?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Chroma from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
HVTrust 2Surface 2Listed 1Score 1Rank 1MCP 1
2026-08-07
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Cohere, Google Gemini
2026-06-26
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared
2026-06-20
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#67 → #56)
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 9.9pts (58.3 → 68.2)
2026-05-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 24pts (67 → 91)
2026-05-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.8pts (51.9 → 64.7)
2026-05-25
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #55

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 74.3 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/chroma.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/chroma)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/chroma"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/chroma.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Memory & Knowledge

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON