updated 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC

Api MCP Server

Repository Website
MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Api MCP Server safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 1%
Last push yesterday
Advisories None known
Compare Api MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Api MCP Server scores 82.2/100 (Grade A), ranked #144 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.3/10; 1% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (hostinger-api-mcp); last pushed 2026-11-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Api MCP Server could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Api MCP Server and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/hostinger/api-mcp-server, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-09. 1% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.3/10 (scanned Oct 25, 2026, refresh pending). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection4
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies1
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 4
    CI-Tests 0
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 1
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 10

  3. Published packages Linked and attested

    • npm hostinger-api-mcp Source link points back to this repo Build provenance attested

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: hostinger-api-mcp 3.31.1. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-09).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-23 Package provenance attestation detected
  • 2026-08-29 OSSF Scorecard: 5.4/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Api MCP Server’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Api MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

  1. #60 Enquire MCP 82.4 +0.2
  2. #61 Quicken Mac MCP 82.4 +0.2
  3. #62 Api MCP Server 82.2 this agent
  4. #63 UniFi Access MCP 82.1 −0.1
  5. #64 Zotero MCP 82.1 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Api MCP Server’s 82.2.

Where the 82.2 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

82.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Api MCP Server MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
14.2 / 25
3.4 above avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.3 above avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.0 / 17
0.7 above avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
7.7 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
12.6 / 20
5.0 above avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-11-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 22 spots (#163 → #141)
2026-10-19
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-10-18
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
71.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#62
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
171
Forks
59
Last Push
2026-11-09
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
100
Downloads (7d)
252,834
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
14
Rank Change
▼3
was #141

Analysis

Activity Inputs

71.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
13.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.3 / 20

Common questions about Api MCP Server

Public supply-chain signals for Api MCP Server are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Api MCP Server carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Api MCP Server publish package provenance?
Yes. Api MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Api MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Api MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Api MCP Server actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Api MCP Server use?
Api MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Api MCP Server's commits signed?
1% of the last 100 commits to Api MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Api MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Api MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Google Gemini, Postgres
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Api MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Api MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 13Grade 11HVTrust 3Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1Provenance 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-11-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 22 spots (#163 → #141)
2026-10-19
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-10-18
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-10-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-10-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-09-28
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-09-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-09-25
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-09-24
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Google Gemini, Postgres
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → A
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 584 spots (#726 → #142)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 49.7pts (30.3 → 80.0)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #726
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#80 → #115)
2026-09-02
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → A
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 555 spots (#637 → #82)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 29.7pts (51.7 → 81.4)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#619 → #637)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#585 → #619)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.4/10
2026-08-29
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 115 spots (#696 → #581)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 7.5pts (44.0 → 51.5)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#672 → #696)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#657 → #672)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 100 spots (#557 → #657)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#548 → #561)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#562 → #549)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#552 → #562)
GitHub → Website → npm: hostinger-api-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 82.2 Grade A
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/api-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/api-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/api-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/api-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON