AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server

Connect Claude AI to your Nextcloud via the Model Context Protocol. Browse, search, and manage files through natural con

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade A Listed MIT
80.1/100
Rank #131 of 1328
Compare AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-07 · 1d ago
Recent change
Grade Changed +8

Is AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server safe? AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server scores 80.1/100 (Grade A), ranked #131 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.1/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-07. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-08
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → A
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 672 spots (#803 → #131)
2026-09-08
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 27.1pts (53.0 → 80.1)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
57.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#61

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-08 15:33 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-08

Activity & Reach

Stars
34
Forks
10
Last Push
2026-09-07
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
30
Downloads (7d)
308
npm
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
51
Rank Change
▲672
was #803

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

80.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
18.9 / 25
9.0 above avg 9.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.8 / 17
0.8 above avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.9 / 20
5.7 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.0 / 20
in line with avg 6.9

Activity Inputs

57.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
9.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
18.6 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
5.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 2, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 8
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 2
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 4
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 1

Is AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server safe?

Public supply-chain signals for AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server publish package provenance?
Yes. AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server use?
AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AIquila — Nextcloud MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 13HVTrust 2Grade 2Listed 1Score 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-08
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → A
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 672 spots (#803 → #131)
2026-09-08
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 27.1pts (53.0 → 80.1)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#773 → #803)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#760 → #773)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 68 spots (#692 → #760)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#669 → #692)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#631 → #669)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#612 → #634)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#581 → #612)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#545 → #580)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#535 → #545)
2026-08-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.7/10
2026-08-27
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 124 spots (#659 → #535)
2026-08-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 7.8pts (43.8 → 51.6)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 99 spots (#560 → #659)
2026-08-11
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 5pts (47 → 52)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#553 → #574)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #550

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 80.1 Grade A
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/aiquila-nextcloud-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/aiquila-nextcloud-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/aiquila-nextcloud-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/aiquila-nextcloud-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON