agentos

TypeScript AI agent framework: cognitive memory, runtime tool forging, multi-agent orchestration, 11 LLM providers.

Agent Frameworks TypeScript Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
44.6/100
Rank #1058 of 1328
Compare agentos

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-12 · 6d ago
Recent change
Rank

Is agentos safe? agentos scores 44.6/100 (Grade D), ranked #1058 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-09-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#1018 → #1053)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 115 spots (#1133 → #1018)
2026-09-10
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.0pts (40.8 → 45.8)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
62.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#95

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-18 13:03 UTC · Repo last pushed 6 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-18

Activity & Reach

Stars
668
Forks
97
Last Push
2026-09-12
6 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
8?
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▲1
was #1059

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

44.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

agentos Agent Frameworks average (122 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.9 / 25
4.8 below avg 9.7
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.8 / 17
0.6 below avg 12.4
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.5 / 20
in line with avg 13.9
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.8 / 20
4.4 below avg 11.2

Activity Inputs

62.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
17.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.2 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
11.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
9.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.9 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 14, 2026
Signed Commits
0%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is agentos safe?

Public trust evidence for agentos is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does agentos publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for agentos. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does agentos have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
agentos has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is agentos actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 6 day(s).
What license does agentos use?
agentos ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are agentos's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to agentos are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
3 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Extensions
Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.
  • database
  • shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain agentos?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores agentos from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 25HVTrust 3Score 3Listed 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#1018 → #1053)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 115 spots (#1133 → #1018)
2026-09-10
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.0pts (40.8 → 45.8)
2026-09-10
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 13pts (46 → 60)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#1120 → #1133)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#1091 → #1112)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 118 spots (#973 → #1091)
2026-09-06
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 3.9pts (44.9 → 41.0)
2026-09-06
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 12pts (59 → 47)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 50 spots (#923 → #973)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 90 spots (#833 → #923)
2026-09-04
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (66 → 60)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#784 → #833)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#743 → #784)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#710 → #743)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#674 → #710)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#654 → #674)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#610 → #654)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#586 → #610)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#568 → #586)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 594 spots (#1162 → #568)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 29.6pts (18.4 → 48.0)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#1149 → #1162)
2026-08-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#1143 → #1160)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#1113 → #1137)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#1095 → #1119)
2026-08-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1085 → #1095)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1079 → #1090)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#1091 → #1079)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 69 spots (#1018 → #1087)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 517 spots (#493 → #1010)
2026-08-03
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #451

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 44.6 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentos.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentos)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentos"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentos.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON