Is agentUniverse safe to use?

agentUniverse has an HVTrust score of 53.4/100 (Grade C), ranked #293 of 468 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for agentUniverse?

agentUniverse scores 53.4/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 2.3k GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Frameworks.

agentUniverse

agentuniverse-ai/agentUniverse

agentUniverse is a LLM multi-agent framework that allows developers to easily build multi-agent applications.

Agent Frameworks Python Grade C Listed Apache-2.0

53.4/100

Rank #293 of 468

Compare agentUniverse

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-07-28 · 9d ago

Recent change

No recent signal change

Is agentUniverse safe? agentUniverse scores 53.4/100 (Grade C), ranked #293 of 468 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.1/10; 42% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-28. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

#60 LazyLLM — 54.0 (C) → #61 ControlFlow — 53.9 (C) → #63 Agently — 53.2 (C) → #64 Mirascope — 50.9 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-07-20

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Redis

2026-07-17

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: DeepSeek

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#255 → #271)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for agentUniverse View Agent Frameworks Report missing data

81.3

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#62

In Agent Frameworks

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-08-06

Activity & Reach

Stars

2.3k

Forks

417

Last Push

2026-07-28

9 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

197

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼2

was #291

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

53.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

agentUniverse Agent Frameworks average (103 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.2 / 25

1.8 below avg 9.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.9 below avg 11.7

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.0 / 17

in line with avg 12.0

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.4 / 20

4.8 above avg 14.6

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

8.1 / 20

3.8 below avg 11.9

Activity Inputs

81.3 / 100

StarsRepository reach

20.2 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

23.8 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

12.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.1 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Jul 11, 2026 (refresh pending)

Signed Commits

42%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 0

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 10

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow -1

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions -1

Vulnerabilities 4

Is agentUniverse safe?

Public trust evidence for agentUniverse is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does agentUniverse publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for agentUniverse. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does agentUniverse have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

agentUniverse has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is agentUniverse actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 9 days ago.

What license does agentUniverse use?

agentUniverse ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are agentUniverse's commits signed?

42% of the last 100 commits to agentUniverse are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

medium confidence

Declared

MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

6 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to agentUniverse's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-07-20

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Redis

2026-07-17

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: DeepSeek

2026-07-04

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Google Gemini

Maintain agentUniverse?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores agentUniverse from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-07-20

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Redis

2026-07-17

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: DeepSeek

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#255 → #271)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#240 → #255)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 23 spots (#217 → #240)

2026-07-10

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#231 → #219)

2026-07-09

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-07-09

Rank Moved

Rank rose 43 spots (#274 → #231)

2026-07-09

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 9.1pts (41.5 → 50.6)

2026-07-09

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 23pts (47 → 70)

2026-07-04

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Google Gemini

2026-06-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#228 → #259)

2026-06-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#210 → #228)

2026-06-22

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.6/10

2026-06-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 79 spots (#289 → #210)

2026-06-22

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 26.6pts (19.1 → 45.7)

2026-06-21

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #289

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentuniverse.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentuniverse)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentuniverse"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentuniverse.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON