Rasa vs TEN Framework
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Rasa and TEN Framework, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
TEN Framework leads on trust — 61.0/100 (Grade C) vs 59.8/100 (Grade C), a 1.2-point gap. Note: TEN Framework's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage C vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | RasaRasaHQ/rasa | TEN FrameworkTEN-framework/ten-framework |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 59.8 | 61.0 |
| Evidence grade | C | C |
| Coverage grade | A | C |
| Overall rank | #222 | #210 |
| Rank in Voice & Conversational | #5 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 21.3k | 11.0k |
| Last updated | 11d ago | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.2 / 10 | 5.0 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 69k/wk | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 6.5 | 11.2 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.9 | 12.8 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 11.3 | 18.7 |
| Adoption / 20 | 16.8 | 9.7 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | — |
| External providers | 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Postgres, Redis | 1 — OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | extensions |
| Provenance drift | Match | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →