Registry › Compare › Qwen Audio Agent vs TEN Framework

Qwen Audio Agent vs TEN Framework

Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust: 86.0/100 (Grade A) against 58.0/100 (Grade C), a 28.0-point gap. Qwen Audio Agent leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

A Qwen Audio Agent 86.0

A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents

QwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent · #71 overall · #2 Voice & Conversational · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Qwen Audio Agent if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+8.9Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 5.5 against 4.0
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+2.6Maintenance
+1.8Adoption

C TEN Framework 58.0

Open-source framework for conversational voice AI agents

TEN-framework/ten-framework · #700 overall · #8 Voice & Conversational · coverage C (2/5)

TEN Framework doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

18.9

Safety / IntegrityQwen Audio Agent +8.9

10.0

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceQwen Audio Agent +7.2

10.8

13.2

TransparencyQwen Audio Agent +1.3

11.9

19.8

MaintenanceQwen Audio Agent +2.6

17.2

11.5

AdoptionQwen Audio Agent +1.8

9.7

+4.6

Runtime calibrationQwen Audio Agent +6.2

-1.6

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Qwen Audio Agent and TEN Framework, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent	TEN FrameworkTEN-framework/ten-framework
HVTrust score	86.0	58.0
Evidence grade	A	C
Coverage grade	B	C
Overall rank	#71	#700
Rank in Voice & Conversational	#2	#8
GitHub stars	2.8k	11.1k
Last updated	3d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	5.5 / 10	4.0 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	NOASSERTION
Downloads	247/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	18.9	10.0
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	13.2	11.9
Maintenance / 20	19.8	17.2
Adoption / 20	11.5	9.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	—	1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	—	extensions
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → Qwen Audio Agent profile TEN Framework profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →