RegistryCompare › Qwen Audio Agent vs TEN Framework

Qwen Audio Agent vs TEN Framework

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Qwen Audio Agent and TEN Framework, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust — 85.0/100 (Grade A) vs 59.8/100 (Grade C), a 25.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent TEN FrameworkTEN-framework/ten-framework
HVTrust score 85.0 59.8
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade B C
Overall rank #73 #591
Rank in Voice & Conversational #3 #6
GitHub stars 2.4k 11.1k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10 5.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 257/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.5 11.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.2 12.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 16.9
Adoption / 20 11.3 9.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Qwen Audio Agent profile TEN Framework profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →