Registry › Compare › Pipecat vs Rasa

Pipecat vs Rasa

Pipecat leads on trust: 87.1/100 (Grade A) against 57.2/100 (Grade C), a 29.9-point gap. Pipecat leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance.

A Pipecat 87.1

Open Source framework for voice agents, multimodal apps, and realtime AI. Maintained by Daily and the community.

pipecat-ai/pipecat · #73 overall · #3 Voice & Conversational · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Pipecat if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.

+14.7Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 102d ago
+8.5Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 5.3
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+1.9Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 5.3

C Rasa 57.2

💬 Open source machine learning framework to automate text- and voice-based conversations: NLU, dialogue management, connect to Slack, Facebook, and more - Create chatbots and voice assistants

RasaHQ/rasa · #784 overall · #10 Voice & Conversational · coverage A (4/5)

Rasa doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

18.1

Safety / IntegrityPipecat +8.5

9.6

18.0

Identity / ProvenancePipecat +7.2

10.8

14.9

TransparencyPipecat +1.9

13.0

19.9

MaintenancePipecat +14.7

5.2

17.5

AdoptionPipecat +1.0

16.5

-1.3

Runtime calibrationRasa +3.4

+2.1

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Pipecat and Rasa, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Pipecatpipecat-ai/pipecat	RasaRasaHQ/rasa
HVTrust score	87.1	57.2
Evidence grade	A	C
Coverage grade	A	A
Overall rank	#73	#784
Rank in Voice & Conversational	#3	#10
GitHub stars	17.0k	21.4k
Last updated	1d ago	102d ago
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	7.5 / 10	5.3 / 10
License	BSD-2-Clause	Apache-2.0
Downloads	348k/wk	40k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	18.1	9.6
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	14.9	13.0
Maintenance / 20	19.9	5.2
Adoption / 20	17.5	16.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	—
External providers	7 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Groq, …	3 — Amazon Bedrock, Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Pipecat profile Rasa profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →