RegistryCompare › Pg Aiguide vs Waza

Pg Aiguide vs Waza

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Pg Aiguide and Waza, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Waza leads on trust — 68.9/100 (Grade B) vs 62.4/100 (Grade C), a 6.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Pg Aiguidetimescale/pg-aiguide Wazatw93/Waza
HVTrust score 62.4 68.9
Evidence grade C B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #6 #4
Rank in Agent Skills #6 #4
GitHub stars 1.8k 6.8k
Last updated 47d ago 3d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 51/wk 265/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.0 7.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 8.5 8.5
Maintenance / 20 8.9 18.5
Adoption / 20 10.1 12.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 2 — OpenAI, Postgres
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Pg Aiguide profile Waza profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →